• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases.

作者信息

Chu Peiguo G, Lau Sean K, Weiss Lawrence M, Kawachi Mark, Yoshida Jeffrey, Ruel Christopher, Nelson Rebecca, Crocitto Laura, Wilson Timothy

机构信息

Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2009 May;23(5):1058-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0131-6. Epub 2008 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-008-0131-6
PMID:18813992
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The assessment of prostate weight as a determinant of a high prostate margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has not been studied.

METHODS

Prospective pathologic findings of 1,500 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP, 399 cases) and da Vinci prostatectomy (DVP, 1,101 cases) between December 2000 to June 2006 at City of Hope National Medical Center were evaluated. Gleason score, pathologic stage, the presence or absence of positive margins, extraprostatic tumor extension, and seminal vesicle involvement by tumor were recorded in all patients. Preoperational serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were recorded in all but 13 cases. These parameters were then correlated with prostate weight.

RESULTS

Of 1,500 patients, 345 had one or more positive margins (23%). Patients with low median prostate weight (49 g) had a significantly higher positive margin rate (p < 0.0001) and incidence of extraprostatic extension by tumor (p = 0.04), and were 1.523 times more likely to have positive margins [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.167-1.985].

CONCLUSION

We conclude that low prostate weight may be a determinant of a higher recurrence rate and more aggressive disease.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases.
Surg Endosc. 2009 May;23(5):1058-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0131-6. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
2
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
3
Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术、开放式经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术和腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的阳性切缘特征:来自单一学术中心的比较组织病理学研究。
Hum Pathol. 2012 Feb;43(2):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
4
The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.在已有的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术项目中增加机器人手术:对手术切缘阳性的影响。
Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994-9.
5
Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.机器人辅助或纯腹腔镜神经保留根治性前列腺切除术:哪种手术切缘更优?单中心经验。
Int J Urol. 2012 Dec;19(12):1076-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03102.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
6
The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.前列腺重量在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中的影响
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):928-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
7
The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.根治性前列腺切除标本中手术切缘阳性范围与前列腺特异性抗原复发之间的关系。
Hum Pathol. 2007 Aug;38(8):1207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 May 8.
8
The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.在根治性前列腺切除术中,对于原本局限于器官内的疾病,包膜切口处手术切缘阳性的意义。
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.159. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
9
Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas.与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术相比,腹腔镜手术治疗日本临床局限性前列腺癌短期前列腺特异抗原(PSA)复发率更高的影响
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(11):2959-61.
10
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Bony Pelvic and Prostate Dimensions on Surgical Difficulty of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Original Study and Meta-analysis.骨盆和前列腺骨性结构对机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术手术难度的影响:一项原创性研究和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8405-8420. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15769-w. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Robotic Prostatectomy Has a Superior Outcome in Larger Prostates and PSA Density Is a Strong Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence.机器人前列腺切除术在较大前列腺中具有更好的结果,且前列腺特异性抗原密度是生化复发的有力预测指标。
Prostate Cancer. 2014;2014:763863. doi: 10.1155/2014/763863. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in complex surgical cases.复杂手术病例中的腹腔镜腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术
J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1765-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.034.
2
Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.前列腺大小对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的影响。
J Endourol. 2007 Feb;21(2):184-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0163.
3
Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases.内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术:莱比锡大学1300例手术经验
World J Urol. 2007 Mar;25(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0156-9. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
4
Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.开放性与腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术
Rev Urol. 2005 Summer;7(3):115-27.
5
Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study.前列腺大小与高级别、晚期前列腺癌风险及根治性前列腺切除术后生化进展:一项检索数据库研究
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23(30):7546-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.525.
6
The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.前列腺大小对腹腔镜前列腺根治术的影响。
Eur Urol. 2005 Aug;48(2):285-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029.
7
Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待对比
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043739.
8
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: an apparently safe and effective procedure.新辅助激素治疗后腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:一种明显安全有效的手术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Dec;14(6):335-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2004.14.335.
9
Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.微创根治性前列腺切除术
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Sep;79(9):1169-80. doi: 10.4065/79.9.1169.
10
Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: part I.开放性与腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术:第一部分。
BJU Int. 2004 Jul;94(2):238-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04950.x.