Suppr超能文献

检验医院价值主张:效率与质量的实证分析

Testing the hospital value proposition: an empirical analysis of efficiency and quality.

作者信息

Huerta Timothy R, Ford Eric W, Peterson Lori T, Brigham Keith H

机构信息

Health Organization Management, Rawls College of Business Administration, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Oct-Dec;33(4):341-9. doi: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000318770.82642.c6.

Abstract

PURPOSES

To assess the relationship between hospitals' X-inefficiency levels and overall care quality based on the National Quality Forum's 27 safe practices score and to improve the analytic strategy for assessing X-inefficiency.

METHODOLOGY

The 2005 versions of the American Hospital Association and Leapfrog Group's annual surveys were the basis of the study. Additional case mix indices and market variables were drawn from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data sources and the Area Resource File. Data envelopment analysis was used to determine hospitals' X-inefficiency scores relative to their market-level competitors. Regression was used to assess the relationship between X-inefficiency and quality, controlling for organizational and market characteristics. Expenses (total and labor expenditures), case-mix-adjusted admissions, length of stay, and licensed beds defined the X-inefficiency function. The overall National Quality Forum's safe practice score, health maintenance organization penetration, market share, and teaching status served as independent control variables in the regression.

FINDINGS

The National Quality Forum's safe practice scores are significantly and positively correlated to hospital X-inefficiency levels (beta = .105, p < or = .05). The analysis of the value proposition had very good explanatory power (adjusted R(2) = .414; p < or = .001; df = 7, 265). Contrary to earlier findings, health maintenance organization penetration and being a teaching hospital were positively related to X-inefficiency. Similar with others' findings, greater market share and for-profit ownership were negatively associated with X-inefficiency.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Measurement of overall hospital quality is improving but can still be made better. Nevertheless, the National Quality Forum's measure is significantly related to efficiency and could be used to create differential pay-for-performance programs. A market-segmented analytic strategy for studying hospitals' efficiency yields results with a high degree of explanatory power.

摘要

目的

基于国家质量论坛的27项安全实践得分,评估医院X低效率水平与整体护理质量之间的关系,并改进评估X低效率的分析策略。

方法

本研究以2005年版美国医院协会和“跨越质量鸿沟”组织的年度调查为基础。其他病例组合指数和市场变量取自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的数据来源以及区域资源文件。数据包络分析用于确定医院相对于其市场层面竞争对手的X低效率得分。回归分析用于评估X低效率与质量之间的关系,并控制组织和市场特征。费用(总支出和劳动力支出)、病例组合调整后的入院人数、住院时间和许可床位定义了X低效率函数。国家质量论坛的总体安全实践得分、健康维护组织渗透率、市场份额和教学地位作为回归中的独立控制变量。

结果

国家质量论坛的安全实践得分与医院X低效率水平显著正相关(β = 0.105,p ≤ 0.05)。价值主张分析具有很好的解释力(调整后的R² = 0.414;p ≤ 0.001;自由度 = 7, 265)。与早期研究结果相反,健康维护组织渗透率和作为教学医院与X低效率呈正相关。与其他研究结果类似,更大的市场份额和营利性所有权与X低效率呈负相关。

实践意义

医院整体质量的衡量正在改善,但仍有提升空间。尽管如此,国家质量论坛的衡量标准与效率显著相关,可用于创建差异化的绩效薪酬计划。一种针对医院效率进行市场细分的分析策略能产生具有高度解释力的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验