• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对做出儿童健康决策的家长的决策支持需求的系统评价。

A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.

作者信息

Jackson Cath, Cheater Francine M, Reid Innes

机构信息

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):232-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00496.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00496.x
PMID:18816320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060453/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the decision support needs of parents attempting to make an informed health decision on behalf of a child.

CONTEXT

The first step towards implementing patient decision support is to assess patients' information and decision-making needs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A systematic search of key bibliographic databases for decision support studies was performed in 2005. Reference lists of relevant review articles and key authors were searched. Three relevant journals were hand searched.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Non-intervention studies containing data on decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted on study characteristics, decision focus and decision support needs. Studies were quality assessed using a pre-defined set of criteria. Data synthesis used the UK Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre approach.

MAIN RESULTS

One-hundred and forty nine studies were included across various child health decisions, settings and study designs. Thematic analysis of decision support needs indicated three key issues: (i) information (including suggestions about the content, delivery, source, timing); (ii) talking to others (including concerns about pressure from others); and (iii) feeling a sense of control over the process that could be influenced by emotionally charged decisions, the consultation process, and structural or service barriers. These were consistent across decision type, study design and whether or not the study focused on informed decision making.

摘要

目的

确定代表孩子做出明智健康决策的家长的决策支持需求。

背景

实施患者决策支持的第一步是评估患者的信息和决策需求。

检索策略

2005年对关键书目数据库进行了系统检索,以查找决策支持研究。检索了相关综述文章和关键作者的参考文献列表。对三种相关期刊进行了手工检索。

纳入标准

包含关于做出儿童健康决策的家长的决策支持需求数据的非干预性研究。

数据提取与综合

提取了关于研究特征、决策重点和决策支持需求的数据。使用预先定义的一组标准对研究进行质量评估。数据综合采用英国政策与实践信息及协调中心的方法。

主要结果

纳入了149项涉及各种儿童健康决策、环境和研究设计的研究。对决策支持需求的主题分析表明了三个关键问题:(i)信息(包括关于内容、传递、来源、时机的建议);(ii)与他人交流(包括对来自他人压力的担忧);以及(iii)对可能受情绪化决策、咨询过程以及结构或服务障碍影响其过程的控制感。这些在决策类型、研究设计以及研究是否侧重于明智决策方面都是一致的。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.对做出儿童健康决策的家长的决策支持需求的系统评价。
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):232-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00496.x.
2
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
3
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.关于进行筛查测试的明智决策的个性化风险沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub2.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
5
Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.针对向父母宣传或教育幼儿疫苗接种情况的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 8;5(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub3.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs.针对有复杂需求的儿童的父母和照顾者的同伴支持干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD010618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2.
9
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
10
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
'Feeling like you can't do anything because you don't know where to start'-Parents' Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Early Detection for Children at Risk of Cerebral Palsy.“感觉因为不知道从哪里开始而什么都做不了”——父母对脑瘫风险儿童早期检测的障碍和促进因素的看法。
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Jul;51(4):e70100. doi: 10.1111/cch.70100.
2
Surgical decision-making regarding hearing and ear reconstruction in craniofacial microsomia: Exploring caregiver narratives.颅面微小畸形中听力与耳部重建的外科决策:探究照料者的叙述
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 May;53(5):642-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.01.019. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
3
Revitalizing preschool minds: a fresh approach to arts-based brain health interventions.振兴学前儿童的思维:一种基于艺术的大脑健康干预新方法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 27;12:1398925. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398925. eCollection 2024.
4
Shepherding parents to prepare for end-of-life decision-making: a critical phenomenological study of the communication approach of paediatricians caring for children with life-limiting conditions in Australia.引导家长为临终决策做准备:对澳大利亚照顾生命有限儿童的儿科医生沟通方法的关键现象学研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 30;13(12):e075740. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075740.
5
How Do Families Experience and Interact with CPS?家庭如何体验儿童保护服务并与之互动?
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2020 Nov;692(1):203-226. doi: 10.1177/0002716220979520. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
6
Parents' experiences of being involved in medical decision-making for their child with a life-limiting condition: A systematic review with narrative synthesis.家长参与患有危及生命疾病的儿童医疗决策的体验:系统评价与叙事合成。
Palliat Med. 2024 Jan;38(1):7-24. doi: 10.1177/02692163231214414. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
7
Decisional Support Needed when Facing Tough Decisions: Survey of Parents with Children having Differences of Sex Development.面对艰难决策时所需的决策支持:对有性发育差异孩子的家长的调查
Front Urol. 2023;3. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1089077. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
8
Co-creating a suite of patient decision aids for parents of an infant or young child with differences of sex development: A methods roadmap.共同为患有性发育差异的婴幼儿父母创建一套患者决策辅助工具:方法路线图。
Front Urol. 2023;2. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2022.1020152. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
9
Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure.帮助患者和专业人员选择合适的肾衰竭治疗方法的决策辅助工具。
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Sep 13;16(Suppl 1):i20-i38. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad172. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Strengthening Equitable Access to Care and Support for Children with Cerebral Palsy and Their Caregivers.加强为脑瘫儿童及其照顾者提供公平的医疗服务和支持。
Children (Basel). 2023 Jun 1;10(6):994. doi: 10.3390/children10060994.

本文引用的文献

1
Embodied Knowledge and Making Sense of Prenatal Diagnosis.具身知识与理解产前诊断
J Genet Couns. 1999 Oct;8(5):255-74. doi: 10.1023/A:1022901131305.
2
To Use or Not to Use: Male Partners' Perspectives on Decision Making About Prenatal Diagnosis.用还是不用:男性伴侣对产前诊断决策的看法。
J Genet Couns. 2000 Feb;9(1):33-45. doi: 10.1023/A:1009429106757.
3
From patient to consumer in the medical marketplace.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2007 Winter;16(1):109-13. doi: 10.1017/s0963180107070119.
4
A systematic review of information in decision aids.对决策辅助工具中的信息进行的系统评价。
Health Expect. 2007 Mar;10(1):46-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00420.x.
5
Sources of infant feeding information used by pregnant women.孕妇使用的婴儿喂养信息来源。
J Perinat Educ. 2001 Summer;10(3):20-6. doi: 10.1624/105812401X88291.
6
Is the cultural context of MMR rejection a key to an effective public health discourse?麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗(MMR)接种抵制现象的文化背景是有效开展公共卫生宣传的关键所在吗?
Public Health. 2006 Sep;120(9):783-94. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
7
'Combined vaccines are like a sudden onslaught to the body's immune system': parental concerns about vaccine 'overload' and 'immune-vulnerability'.联合疫苗对人体免疫系统而言犹如一场突然袭击:家长对疫苗“过载”和“免疫脆弱性”的担忧。
Vaccine. 2006 May 15;24(20):4321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
8
Parents' reported reasons for avoiding MMR vaccination. A telephone survey.家长报告的避免接种麻腮风三联疫苗的原因。一项电话调查。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005 Sep;23(3):149-53. doi: 10.1080/02813430510031306.
9
A survey of UK parental attitudes to the MMR vaccine and trust in medical authority.一项关于英国父母对麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹联合疫苗(MMR疫苗)的态度以及对医疗权威信任度的调查。
Vaccine. 2006 Jan 12;24(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.063. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
10
Internet use by parents of children undergoing outpatient otolaryngology procedures.接受门诊耳鼻喉科手术患儿家长的互联网使用情况。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Aug;131(8):719-22. doi: 10.1001/archotol.131.8.719.