Rotov M
Dept. of Human Services, Division of Mental Health and Hospitals, Trenton, NJ 08625-0727.
Schizophr Bull. 1991;17(2):183-6; discussion 187-9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/17.2.183.
The author uses a segment of the National Plan for Schizophrenia Research as a representation of the current academia-driven philosophical trend of "Biological Psychiatry." A criticism of the underlying assumptions of this school of thought is offered, including the doctrines of physicalism, essentialism, and logical positivism. Quotations from authoritative sources are provided to indicate that modern biology rests on entirely different assumptions and that different models and scientific methods are in order in psychiatry to get in step with the progress in contemporary science.
作者选取了《精神分裂症研究国家计划》的一部分内容,以此展现当前学术界主导的“生物精神病学”哲学思潮。本文对这一思想流派的潜在假设提出了批判,包括物理主义、本质主义和逻辑实证主义等学说。文中引用了权威资料,以表明现代生物学基于完全不同的假设,并且在精神病学领域需要采用不同的模型和科学方法,才能跟上当代科学的发展步伐。