• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节表面置换术后手术体位对界面压力和初始骨重塑刺激的作用。

Role of surgical position on interface stress and initial bone remodeling stimulus around hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

机构信息

Exponent, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2009 Oct;24(7):1137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.005
PMID:18823747
Abstract

Valgus alignment of femoral resurfacing components has been advocated to reduce proximal femur loading and thus minimize the risk for femoral neck fractures. However, such reduction in loading may exacerbate undesirable stress shielding. This study examined the effect of extreme implant orientations (+/-15 degrees ) and stem canal overreaming on initial bone remodeling stimulus using finite element models. The changes in implant-cement interface stresses due to implant alignment were also evaluated. The valgus model showed increased initial bone resorption stimulus, which extended distally and peripherally around the femoral neck. The peak implant-cement interface shear stress for the varus model was 10.9 MPa, exceeding the interface shear strength. Overreaming of the stem canal eliminated distal tip loading, but proximal stress shielding was still unavoidable. These data show bone loading and interface fixation trends emanating from valgus and varus implant positions that will be of interest to practicing physicians.

摘要

提倡股骨表面置换组件的外翻对准,以减少股骨近端的负荷,从而最大限度地降低股骨颈骨折的风险。然而,这种负荷的减少可能会加剧不良的应力遮挡。本研究使用有限元模型研究了极端植入物取向(±15 度)和髓腔扩孔对初始骨重塑刺激的影响。还评估了由于植入物对准引起的植入物-水泥界面应力的变化。外翻模型显示初始骨吸收刺激增加,这种刺激向股骨颈的远端和周围延伸。内翻模型的峰值植入物-水泥界面剪切应力为 10.9 MPa,超过了界面剪切强度。髓腔扩孔消除了尖端的远端加载,但近端的应力遮挡仍然不可避免。这些数据显示了从外翻和内翻植入位置产生的骨负荷和界面固定趋势,这将引起临床医生的兴趣。

相似文献

1
Role of surgical position on interface stress and initial bone remodeling stimulus around hip resurfacing arthroplasty.髋关节表面置换术后手术体位对界面压力和初始骨重塑刺激的作用。
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Oct;24(7):1137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
2
[Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].[非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术:髓外参数对初始植入物稳定性及骨-植入物界面应力的影响]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000 Oct;86(6):590-7.
3
A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.骨水泥表面置换股骨失效机制的数值研究:界面特性和骨重塑的影响
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2009 May;223(4):471-84. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM488.
4
Influence of the stem fixation scenario on load transfer in a hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a biomimetic stem.仿生柄在髋关节表面置换术中柄固定情况对负荷传递的影响。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 May;45:90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
5
Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.伯明翰髋关节表面置换术的生物力学
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Aug;88(8):1110-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17567.
6
Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.髋关节置换术新概念的实验评估
Acta Orthop Suppl. 2012 Apr;83(345):1-26. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.678804.
7
Load-transfer analysis after insertion of cementless anatomical femoral stem using pre- and post-operative CT images based patient-specific finite element analysis.基于术前和术后 CT 图像的患者特定有限元分析的非骨水泥解剖股骨柄植入后的载荷传递分析。
Med Eng Phys. 2014 Jun;36(6):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.018. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
8
Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.考虑不同髋关节假体设计的骨重塑与适应性的数值评估
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017 Dec;50:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.10.015. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
9
A mechanical analysis of femoral resurfacing implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.股骨头坏死股骨表面置换植入物的力学分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Dec;25(8):1282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
10
Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.髋关节表面置换组件的位置会影响股骨颈的应变和抗骨折能力。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1951-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00788.

引用本文的文献

1
Load transfer in bone after partial, multi-compartmental, and total knee arthroplasty.部分、多间室及全膝关节置换术后骨内的负荷传递
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Mar 8;12:1274496. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1274496. eCollection 2024.
2
Design of custom-made navigational template of femoral head and pilot research in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.定制股骨头导航模板的设计及全髋关节表面置换术的初步研究
BMC Surg. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00807-7.
3
Resurfacing head size and femoral fracture: Are registry conclusions on head size justified?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Dec;25(8):1301-5. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1704-4. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
4
2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.2011 年马歇尔·乌里斯青年研究员奖:髋关节表面置换术后何时允许患者进行高影响活动。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2131-4. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
5
A simple technique for alignment in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: technical note and preliminary report.一种全髋关节表面置换术中的简单对位技术:技术说明及初步报告。
HSS J. 2009 Sep;5(2):129-36. doi: 10.1007/s11420-009-9117-8. Epub 2009 Jun 9.