Suppr超能文献

通过免疫荧光法检测的血清自身抗体证实,无法将小儿自身免疫性神经精神障碍伴链球菌感染相关疾病(PANDAS)和抽动秽语综合征与对照组区分开来。

Serum autoantibodies measured by immunofluorescence confirm a failure to differentiate PANDAS and Tourette syndrome from controls.

作者信息

Morris Christina M, Pardo-Villamizar Carlos, Gause Colin D, Singer Harvey S

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Pathology 235, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Neurol Sci. 2009 Jan 15;276(1-2):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.08.032. Epub 2008 Sep 27.

Abstract

PANDAS and some cases of Tourette syndrome (TS) have been proposed to be post-streptococcal movement disorders in which antibodies produced against group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus cross react against brain epitopes. Attempts to identify disease specific anti-striatal antibodies in the serum of affected patients have focused on the use of Western immunoblotting and ELISA methodologies. In this study, immunohistochemical techniques were used to identify serum anti-striatal antibody reactivity. In positive samples, double staining with anti-GFAP (glial) and anti-MAP2 (neuronal) was used to establish localization of the immunofluorescence. No significant differences in immunofluorescence or localization were identified in patients with PANDAS (n=30) and TS (n=30) as compared to controls (n=30). IF reactivity did not correlate with tic severity or elevated titers of antistreptococcal antibodies. Further comparisons showed no correlation between autoreactivity determined by immunofluorescence and the presence of previously measured immunoblot reactivity against human caudate or putative antigens (pyruvate kinase M1 and aldolase C). These results confirm an inability to distinguish patient populations by antibody measurements and raise further concerns about the presence of an autoimmune mechanism in PANDAS and TS.

摘要

PANDAS和一些抽动秽语综合征(TS)病例被认为是链球菌感染后运动障碍,其中针对A组β溶血性链球菌产生的抗体与脑表位发生交叉反应。在受影响患者的血清中鉴定疾病特异性抗纹状体抗体的尝试主要集中在使用蛋白质免疫印迹法和酶联免疫吸附测定法。在本研究中,采用免疫组织化学技术鉴定血清抗纹状体抗体反应性。在阳性样本中,使用抗GFAP(神经胶质)和抗MAP2(神经元)双重染色来确定免疫荧光的定位。与对照组(n = 30)相比,PANDAS患者(n = 30)和TS患者(n = 30)在免疫荧光或定位方面未发现显著差异。免疫荧光反应性与抽动严重程度或抗链球菌抗体滴度升高无关。进一步比较显示,通过免疫荧光测定的自身反应性与先前测定的针对人尾状核或推定抗原(丙酮酸激酶M1和醛缩酶C)的蛋白质免疫印迹反应性之间没有相关性。这些结果证实无法通过抗体测量来区分患者群体,并进一步引发了对PANDAS和TS中自身免疫机制存在的担忧。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验