Alencar Jeronimo, Marcondes Carlos Brisola, Serra-Freire Nicolau Maués, Lorosa Elias Seixas, Pacheco Juliana Barreto, Guimarães Anthony Erico
Laboratório de Diptera, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, 20945-900 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Med Entomol. 2008 Sep;45(5):873-6. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[873:fpohca]2.0.co;2.
We present the identification of bloodfeeding sources of Haemagogus (Haemagogus) capricornii Lutz and Haemagogus (Conopostegus) leucocelaenus (Dyar & Shannon) (Diptera: Culicidae) from different regions of Brazil, as analyzed by precipitin tests. Anti-sera for bird, bovine, equine, human, opossum, and rodent were used. Two hundred one mosquitoes were examined (147 Hg. leucocelaenus and 54 Hg. capricornii), of which 177 reacted for some anti-serum. For Hg. leucocelaenus, 86 (68.3%) reacted to one blood source, 38 (30.2%) to two sources, and two (1.6%) to three sources; the combinations of bird + human (18.4%), bird + rodent (15.8%), and bird + marsupial (15.8%) were the most frequent. For Hg. capricornii, 34 (66.7%) reacted to one blood source; combinations bird + rodent (37.5%) and bird + marsupial (25%) were the most frequent combinations. Mosquito preference for bloodfeeding sources was different in these areas, possibly because of the availability of sources. This diversity of sources can have important epidemiological implications.
我们展示了通过沉淀试验分析,从巴西不同地区鉴定出的卡氏白蛉(Haemagogus (Haemagogus) capricornii Lutz)和白纹白蛉(Haemagogus (Conopostegus) leucocelaenus (Dyar & Shannon))(双翅目:蚊科)的吸血来源。使用了针对鸟类、牛、马、人类、负鼠和啮齿动物的抗血清。共检查了201只蚊子(147只白纹白蛉和54只卡氏白蛉),其中177只对某种抗血清有反应。对于白纹白蛉,86只(68.3%)对一种血液来源有反应,38只(30.2%)对两种来源有反应,两只(1.6%)对三种来源有反应;鸟类+人类(18.4%)、鸟类+啮齿动物(15.8%)和鸟类+有袋动物(15.8%)的组合最为常见。对于卡氏白蛉,34只(66.7%)对一种血液来源有反应;鸟类+啮齿动物(37.5%)和鸟类+有袋动物(25%)的组合是最常见的组合。这些地区的蚊子对吸血来源的偏好不同,可能是因为来源的可用性。这种来源的多样性可能具有重要的流行病学意义。