Suppr超能文献

三级医疗中心社区与转诊重症监护病房患者的比较:危重症患者转诊偏倚的证据

Comparison of community and referral intensive care unit patients in a tertiary medical center: evidence for referral bias in the critically ill.

作者信息

Seferian Edward G, Afessa Bekele, Gajic Ognjen, Keegan Mark T, Hubmayr Rolf D

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2779-86. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318186ab1b.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the existence of referral bias in the critically ill by comparing the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of community (Olmsted County, MN residents) and referral (non-Olmsted County residents) patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cohort study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients admitted to the medical and surgical intensive care units at Mayo Medical Center from 1995 to 2004.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Residency status, demographics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, intensive care unit admission diagnosis and treatment status, intensive care unit and hospital mortality, length of stay, and travel distances to Mayo Clinic. Referral patients with a medical intensive care unit admission were more severely ill, had greater mortality rates and length of stay and were more likely to receive an active intensive care unit intervention compared with community patients (p < 0.0001). Referral and community patients who had a surgical intensive care unit admission had similar severity of illness, length of stay, and intensive care unit mortality rate. Hospital mortality rate was lower in the referral surgical patients compared with community surgical patients (p = 0.0001). When adjusted for severity of illness, intensity of treatment, and admission source, community and referral medical intensive care unit patients had a similar risk of hospital death, whereas referral surgical patients had a lower risk of hospital death compared with community patients. Referral patients who had a medical intensive care unit admission and traveled greater distances to Mayo Clinic had greater mortality rates and length of stay; those who had a surgical intensive care unit admission and traveled greater distances had lower mortalities and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who resided outside of our local community and who had medical admissions to the intensive care unit were more severely ill, had greater mortality rates, and had longer length of stay compared with community patients. Our findings support the existence of referral bias in critically ill medical patients at our tertiary medical center.

摘要

目的

通过比较入住重症监护病房的社区患者(明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县居民)和转诊患者(非奥尔姆斯特德县居民)的临床及流行病学特征,确定重症患者中是否存在转诊偏倚。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

学术性三级医疗中心。

患者

1995年至2004年入住梅奥医学中心内科和外科重症监护病房的患者。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

居住状况、人口统计学特征、急性生理与慢性健康状况评估III评分、重症监护病房入院诊断及治疗情况、重症监护病房及医院死亡率、住院时间以及到梅奥诊所的距离。与社区患者相比,入住内科重症监护病房的转诊患者病情更严重,死亡率和住院时间更长,且更有可能接受积极的重症监护病房干预(p < 0.0001)。入住外科重症监护病房的转诊患者和社区患者的疾病严重程度、住院时间及重症监护病房死亡率相似。与社区外科患者相比,转诊外科患者的医院死亡率更低(p = 0.0001)。在对疾病严重程度、治疗强度和入院来源进行调整后,社区和转诊内科重症监护病房患者的医院死亡风险相似,而转诊外科患者的医院死亡风险低于社区患者。入住内科重症监护病房且到梅奥诊所距离更远的转诊患者死亡率和住院时间更长;入住外科重症监护病房且距离更远的患者死亡率和住院时间更低。

结论

与社区患者相比,居住在本地社区以外且入住重症监护病房的内科患者病情更严重,死亡率更高,住院时间更长。我们的研究结果支持在我们的三级医疗中心重症内科患者中存在转诊偏倚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验