Suppr超能文献

医院教学状况对结肠镜检查穿孔风险的影响:一项全国住院患者样本研究。

The Impact of Hospital Teaching Status on Colonoscopy Perforation Risk: A National Inpatient Sample Study.

作者信息

Khalid Mowyad, Khalid Mazin, Gayam Vijay, Yeddi Ahmed, Adam Omeralfaroug, Chakraborty Sandipan, Abdallah Mohamed, Abu-Heija Ahmad, Kaloti Zaid, Mukhtar Osama, Shereef Hammam, Judd Stephanie

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

出版信息

Gastroenterology Res. 2020 Feb;13(1):19-24. doi: 10.14740/gr1234. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy has been widely used as a diagnostic tool for many conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy complications include perforation, hemorrhage, abdominal pain, as well as anesthesia risk. Although rare, perforation is the most dangerous complication that occurs in the immediate post-colonoscopy period with an estimated risk of less than 0.1%. Studies on colonoscopy perforation risk between teaching hospitals and non-teaching hospitals are scarce.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent inpatient colonoscopy between January 2010 and December 2014 in teaching versus non-teaching facilities in order to study their perforation rates. Our study population included 257,006 patients. Univariate regression was performed, and the positive results were analyzed using a multivariate regression module.

RESULTS

Teaching hospitals had a higher risk of perforation (odds ratio 1.23, confidence interval 1.07 - 1.42, P = 0.004). Perforation rates were higher in females, patients with inflammatory bowel disease and dilatation of strictures. Polypectomy did not yield any statistical difference between the study groups. Other factors such as African-American ethnicity appeared to have a lower risk.

CONCLUSION

Perforation rates are higher in teaching hospitals. More studies are needed to examine the difference and how to mitigate the risks.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查已被广泛用作多种病症的诊断工具,包括炎症性肠病和结直肠癌。结肠镜检查并发症包括穿孔、出血、腹痛以及麻醉风险。穿孔虽罕见,但却是结肠镜检查后即刻发生的最危险并发症,估计风险低于0.1%。教学医院与非教学医院之间关于结肠镜检查穿孔风险的研究较少。

方法

查询2010年1月至2014年12月期间在教学医院与非教学医院接受住院结肠镜检查患者的全国住院患者样本数据库,以研究其穿孔率。我们的研究人群包括257,006名患者。进行单因素回归分析,并使用多因素回归模块分析阳性结果。

结果

教学医院穿孔风险更高(比值比1.23,置信区间1.07 - 1.42,P = 0.004)。女性、炎症性肠病患者和狭窄扩张患者的穿孔率更高。息肉切除术在研究组之间未产生任何统计学差异。其他因素,如非裔美国人种族,似乎风险较低。

结论

教学医院的穿孔率更高。需要更多研究来检验这种差异以及如何降低风险。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
3
Current status of endoscopic balloon dilation for Crohn's disease.克罗恩病内镜下球囊扩张的现状
Intest Res. 2017 Apr;15(2):166-173. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.166. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
The role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease.内镜检查在炎症性肠病中的作用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May;81(5):1101-21.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.030. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
7
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):72-90. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.385. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
10
Colonoscopic polypectomy: current techniques and controversies.结肠镜息肉切除术:当前技术和争议。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;42(3):443-58. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.05.015.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验