Khalid Mowyad, Khalid Mazin, Gayam Vijay, Yeddi Ahmed, Adam Omeralfaroug, Chakraborty Sandipan, Abdallah Mohamed, Abu-Heija Ahmad, Kaloti Zaid, Mukhtar Osama, Shereef Hammam, Judd Stephanie
Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Gastroenterology Res. 2020 Feb;13(1):19-24. doi: 10.14740/gr1234. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
Colonoscopy has been widely used as a diagnostic tool for many conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy complications include perforation, hemorrhage, abdominal pain, as well as anesthesia risk. Although rare, perforation is the most dangerous complication that occurs in the immediate post-colonoscopy period with an estimated risk of less than 0.1%. Studies on colonoscopy perforation risk between teaching hospitals and non-teaching hospitals are scarce.
The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent inpatient colonoscopy between January 2010 and December 2014 in teaching versus non-teaching facilities in order to study their perforation rates. Our study population included 257,006 patients. Univariate regression was performed, and the positive results were analyzed using a multivariate regression module.
Teaching hospitals had a higher risk of perforation (odds ratio 1.23, confidence interval 1.07 - 1.42, P = 0.004). Perforation rates were higher in females, patients with inflammatory bowel disease and dilatation of strictures. Polypectomy did not yield any statistical difference between the study groups. Other factors such as African-American ethnicity appeared to have a lower risk.
Perforation rates are higher in teaching hospitals. More studies are needed to examine the difference and how to mitigate the risks.
结肠镜检查已被广泛用作多种病症的诊断工具,包括炎症性肠病和结直肠癌。结肠镜检查并发症包括穿孔、出血、腹痛以及麻醉风险。穿孔虽罕见,但却是结肠镜检查后即刻发生的最危险并发症,估计风险低于0.1%。教学医院与非教学医院之间关于结肠镜检查穿孔风险的研究较少。
查询2010年1月至2014年12月期间在教学医院与非教学医院接受住院结肠镜检查患者的全国住院患者样本数据库,以研究其穿孔率。我们的研究人群包括257,006名患者。进行单因素回归分析,并使用多因素回归模块分析阳性结果。
教学医院穿孔风险更高(比值比1.23,置信区间1.07 - 1.42,P = 0.004)。女性、炎症性肠病患者和狭窄扩张患者的穿孔率更高。息肉切除术在研究组之间未产生任何统计学差异。其他因素,如非裔美国人种族,似乎风险较低。
教学医院的穿孔率更高。需要更多研究来检验这种差异以及如何降低风险。