Cashin Cheryl, Scheffler Richard, Felton Mistique, Adams Neal, Miller Leonard
Nicholas C. Petris Center on Health Care Markets and Consumer Welfare, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Oct;59(10):1107-14. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.10.1107.
This study describes strategies developed by California counties to transform their mental health systems under the 2004 Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). This voter initiative places a 1% tax on annual incomes over $1 million; tax monies are earmarked to transform county-operated mental health services into systems that are oriented more toward recovery. MHSA implementation itself can be considered "transformational" by balancing greater standardization of mental health service delivery in the state with a locally driven planning process.
A qualitative content analysis of the three-year plans submitted by 12 counties to receive funds under MHSA was conducted to identify common themes, as well as innovative approaches. These 12 (out of 58) counties were chosen to represent both small and large counties, as well as geographic diversity, and they represent 62.3% of the state population.
This analysis showed that the state guidelines and local planning process generated consistency across counties in establishing full-service partnerships with a "whatever it takes" approach to providing goal-directed services and supports to consumers and their families. There was, however, little convergence around the specific strategies to achieve this vision, reflecting both the local planning process and a relative lack of clear policy and guidance on evidence-based practices.
There are many obstacles to the successful implementation of these ambitious plans. However, the state-guided, but stakeholder-driven, transformation in California appears to generate innovative approaches to recovery-oriented services, involve consumers and family members in service planning and delivery, and build community partnerships that create new opportunities for consumers to meet their recovery goals.
本研究描述了加利福尼亚州各县根据2004年《精神卫生服务法》(MHSA)制定的精神卫生系统转型策略。这项由选民发起的倡议对年收入超过100万美元的人群征收1%的税;税款专门用于将县运营的精神卫生服务转变为更注重康复的系统。通过在全州精神卫生服务提供的更大标准化与地方驱动的规划过程之间取得平衡,MHSA的实施本身可被视为“变革性的”。
对12个县为获得MHSA资金而提交的三年计划进行定性内容分析,以确定共同主题以及创新方法。这12个县(从58个县中选出)被选中以代表大小不同的县以及地理多样性,它们占该州人口的62.3%。
该分析表明,州指导方针和地方规划过程使各县在与消费者及其家庭建立全方位服务伙伴关系方面保持一致,采用“不惜一切代价”的方法提供目标导向的服务和支持。然而,在实现这一愿景的具体策略方面几乎没有趋同,这既反映了地方规划过程,也反映了在循证实践方面相对缺乏明确的政策和指导。
成功实施这些雄心勃勃的计划存在许多障碍。然而,加利福尼亚州由州指导但由利益相关者驱动的转型似乎产生了以康复为导向的服务的创新方法,让消费者和家庭成员参与服务规划和提供,并建立社区伙伴关系,为消费者创造实现康复目标的新机会。