Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia (Purtle); Department of Psychiatry and Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, University of California, San Diego (Stadnick). Marvin S. Swartz, M.D., is editor of this column.
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Jan 1;71(1):100-104. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900332. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
Earmarking taxes for behavioral health services is a policy strategy that many jurisdictions have implemented to increase funding for behavioral health systems. However, little has been written about these taxes, and limited guidance exists for policy makers who are pursing or implementing such taxes. This column summarizes approaches to designing earmarked behavioral health taxes, evidence of their impact, strategies to enhance implementation, and future directions for research. The column focuses on two jurisdictions: California, which imposes an additional 1% tax on all household income exceeding $1 million, and Washington State, which provides counties with the option of increasing sales tax by 0.1%.
为行为健康服务指定税收是许多司法管辖区实施的一项政策策略,旨在增加行为健康系统的资金。然而,关于这些税收的研究很少,对于正在追求或实施此类税收的政策制定者来说,指导也很有限。本专栏总结了设计指定行为健康税的方法、其影响的证据、增强实施的策略以及未来的研究方向。本专栏重点介绍了两个司法管辖区:加利福尼亚州对所有家庭收入超过 100 万美元的部分额外征收 1%的税,华盛顿州则为各县提供了将销售税提高 0.1%的选择。