Selvaggi Gennaro, Elander Anna
Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Nov;18(6):589-97. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328313679c.
To evaluate current reviews and assess scientific validity of the recent literature on penile reconstruction after trauma, penile reconstruction in gender reassignment surgery, concealed penis, and aphallia.
Technical advances in penile reconstruction have been highlighted. The few long-term follow-up studies available confirm the difficulty of such surgery, in terms of complications and the limits of the final achievable outcomes. The surgery necessitates several steps and a high number of revisions. Scientific progress in penile reconstruction seems slow, with a lack of controlled studies, high rate of loss to follow-up (especially in sex reassignment surgery) and a lack of validated assessment measures. However, a few recent studies are making the problems clearer, especially in patient selection and the avoidance of raising false expectations in patients.
评估近期关于创伤后阴茎重建、性别重置手术中的阴茎重建、隐匿阴茎及无阴茎畸形的文献综述,并评估其科学有效性。
强调了阴茎重建技术的进展。现有的少数长期随访研究证实了此类手术在并发症和最终可实现结果的局限性方面存在困难。该手术需要多个步骤和大量的修复。阴茎重建的科学进展似乎缓慢,缺乏对照研究、随访失访率高(尤其是在性别重置手术中)且缺乏经过验证的评估措施。然而,最近的一些研究使问题更加清晰,特别是在患者选择以及避免对患者产生不切实际的期望方面。