情绪和焦虑症患者在五项量表上的异同。

Similarities and differences on five inventories among mood and anxiety disorder patients.

作者信息

Rosenthal T L, Downs J M, Arheart K L, Deal N, Downs A F, Rosenthal R H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Tennessee, Memphis College of Medicine 38105.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 1991;29(3):239-47. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(91)90113-h.

DOI:10.1016/0005-7967(91)90113-h

PMID:1883303

Abstract

The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), BAROMAS, Leisure Interests Checklist (LIC), Mental Health Inventory (MHI) and a one-page checklist of Body Problems were given to 128 outpatients with serious mood or anxiety disorders. Compared to normative data published on the first four devices, the combined patients were far 'sicker' in nearly all comparisons (P less than or equal to 0.01). However, anxiety and mood patients did not differ on the EPQ, BAROMAS, or LIC. On Body Problems, strong contrasts emerged (P less than 0.04), especially when 'fringe' cases were excluded (e.g. dysthymics from mood, and obsessives from anxiety disorder diagnoses). Small anxiety subtype groups also differed (P less than 0.05). On the MHI, both global and core groups of mood--especially unipolar (depressed)--patients differed from the anxiety disorders (P less than 0.04).

摘要

艾森克人格问卷（EPQ）、巴罗马斯测试（BAROMAS）、休闲兴趣清单（LIC）、心理健康量表（MHI）以及一份关于身体问题的单页清单被分发给128名患有严重情绪或焦虑障碍的门诊患者。与前四种测评工具公布的常模数据相比，在几乎所有比较中，这些综合患者都“病得更重”（P≤0.01）。然而，焦虑症患者和情绪障碍患者在EPQ、BAROMAS或LIC上并无差异。在身体问题方面，出现了显著差异（P＜0.04），尤其是排除“边缘”病例时（例如情绪障碍中的心境恶劣患者，以及焦虑症诊断中的强迫症患者）。小型焦虑症亚型组之间也存在差异（P＜0.05）。在MHI上，情绪障碍患者的整体组和核心组——尤其是单相（抑郁）患者——与焦虑症患者存在差异（P＜0.04）。