Suppr超能文献

关于髂动脉慢性闭塞性病变治疗的思考

[Consideration on the treatment of chronic occlusive lesions of the iliac arteries].

作者信息

Cardia G, Catalano G, Memeo R, De Fazio M

机构信息

Università degli Studi di Bari, Dipartimento Scienze Chirurgiche Generali e Specialistiche.

出版信息

G Chir. 2008 Aug-Sep;29(8-9):379-83.

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of the best treatment for chronic unilateral obstructive lesions of the aorto-iliac arterial axis. After making a review of the literature, some considerations are made. In recent years this disease has increasingly been treated by endovascular methods with dilation (angioplasty) and stents. However, the classic indications (short stenotic obstruction), supported by national and international guidelines, are being continually widened by operators acquiring growing skills with this method. Nevertheless, no long term studies have demonstrated a clear superiority, in severe cases, of endovascular methods over traditional surgical methods (by-pass), as regards either long term results or costs. Among the traditional methods, many surgeons prefer the femoro-femoral by-pass to the orthopic aorto-femoral by-pass, particularly because of its lesser invasiveness. However, it should be noted that comparisons of the two methods have yielded results in favour of the orthotopic procedure, above all about long term results.

摘要

本研究探讨了主动脉-髂动脉轴慢性单侧阻塞性病变的最佳治疗问题。在回顾文献后,进行了一些思考。近年来,这种疾病越来越多地通过血管内方法进行治疗,包括扩张(血管成形术)和支架置入。然而,国家和国际指南所支持的经典适应症(短段狭窄性阻塞),正随着操作者对该方法的技术掌握日益熟练而不断扩大。尽管如此,尚无长期研究表明,在严重病例中,就长期效果或成本而言,血管内方法优于传统手术方法(旁路手术)。在传统方法中,许多外科医生更喜欢股-股旁路手术而非原位主动脉-股旁路手术,特别是因为其侵入性较小。然而,应该指出的是,两种方法的比较结果显示原位手术更具优势,尤其是在长期效果方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验