Suppr超能文献

历史变迁与进化理论。

Historical change and evolutionary theory.

作者信息

Masters Roger D

机构信息

Department of Government, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

出版信息

Politics Life Sci. 2007 Sep;26(2):46-74. doi: 10.2990/26_2_46.

Abstract

Despite advances in fields like genetics, evolutionary psychology, and human behavior and evolution--which generally focus on individual or small group behavior from a biological perspective--evolutionary biology has made little impact on studies of political change and social history. Theories of natural selection often seem inapplicable to human history because our social behavior is embedded in language (which makes possible the concepts of time and social identity on which what we call "history" depends). Peter Corning's Holistic Darwinism reconceptualizes evolutionary biology, making it possible to go beyond the barriers separating the social and natural sciences. Corning focuses on two primary processes: "synergy" (complex multivariate interactions at multiple levels between a species and its environment) and "cybernetics" (the information systems permitting communication between individuals and groups over time). Combining this frame of reference with inclusive fitness theory, it is possible to answer the most important (and puzzling) question in human history: How did a species that lived for millennia in hunter-gatherer bands form centralized states governing large populations of non-kin (including multi-ethnic empires as well as modern nation-states)? The fragility and contemporary ethnic violence in Kenya and the Congo should suffice as evidence that these issues need to be taken seriously. To explain the rise and fall of states as well as changes in human laws and customs--the core of historical research--it is essential to show how the provision of collective goods can overcome the challenge of self-interest and free-riding in some instances, yet fail to do so in others. To this end, it is now possible to consider how a state providing public goods can--under circumstances that often include effective leadership--contribute to enhanced inclusive fitness of virtually all its members. Because social behavior needs to adapt to ecology, but ecological systems are constantly transformed by human technology and social behavior, multilevel evolutionary processes can explain two central features of human history: the rise, transformations, and ultimate fall of centralized governments (the "stuff" of history); and the biological uniqueness of Homo sapiens as the mammalian species that colonized--and became top carnivore--in virtually every habitable environment on the earth's surface. Once scholars admit the necessity of linking processes of natural selection with human transformations of the natural world, it will seem anomalous that it has taken so long to integrate Darwinian biology and the social sciences.

摘要

尽管遗传学、进化心理学以及人类行为与进化等领域取得了进展(这些领域通常从生物学角度关注个体或小群体行为),但进化生物学对政治变革和社会历史研究的影响甚微。自然选择理论往往似乎不适用于人类历史,因为我们的社会行为嵌入在语言之中(语言使得时间和社会身份等概念成为可能,而我们所谓的“历史”就依赖于这些概念)。彼得·康宁的整体达尔文主义重新界定了进化生物学,使得跨越分隔社会科学和自然科学的障碍成为可能。康宁关注两个主要过程:“协同作用”(一个物种与其环境在多个层面上的复杂多变量相互作用)和“控制论”(随着时间推移允许个体和群体之间进行交流的信息系统)。将这个参照框架与广义适合度理论相结合,就有可能回答人类历史上最重要(且令人困惑)的问题:一个在狩猎采集部落中生活了数千年的物种,是如何形成统治大量非亲属群体(包括多民族帝国以及现代民族国家)的中央集权国家的?肯尼亚和刚果的脆弱性以及当代种族暴力应该足以证明这些问题需要得到认真对待。要解释国家的兴衰以及人类法律和习俗的变化——历史研究的核心——就必须说明集体利益的提供如何在某些情况下能够克服自身利益和搭便车的挑战,而在其他情况下却无法做到这一点。为此,现在可以考虑一个提供公共物品的国家如何在通常包括有效领导的情况下,为几乎所有成员提升广义适合度做出贡献。由于社会行为需要适应生态,但生态系统又不断被人类技术和社会行为所改变,多层次进化过程可以解释人类历史的两个核心特征:中央集权政府的兴起、变革和最终衰落(历史的“内容”);以及智人作为在地球表面几乎每一个宜居环境中殖民并成为顶级食肉动物的哺乳动物物种的生物学独特性。一旦学者们承认将自然选择过程与人类对自然世界的改造联系起来的必要性,那么将达尔文生物学与社会科学整合起来花费了如此长的时间就显得反常了。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验