• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在精神病学研究中使用荟萃分析。

Using meta-analysis in psychiatric research.

作者信息

Streiner D L

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 1991 Jun;36(5):357-62. doi: 10.1177/070674379103600508.

DOI:10.1177/070674379103600508
PMID:1884337
Abstract

Meta-analysis is a technique for summarizing the results of many studies which can allow reviewers in a particular field to arrive at a synthesis of the various findings in a more objective manner than relying on expert opinion and combine the results of these studies to arrive at an overall estimate of the magnitude of the effect of a treatment, to determine if the evidence favours its effectiveness. The technique consists of determining an effect size or odds ratio for each study and combining them, taking into account the fact that studies with large samples should exert more influence than those with small samples. However, the procedure is not mechanical. The reviewer must make a series of decisions regarding the studies to be included or excluded, the weight to place on the methodological rigour of the trials, the results from each study to be used, how to handle differences in the magnitude of the results across studies, how to derive the best overall estimate of the effect across studies, and how to determine the precision of that estimate. Each of these decisions can affect both the quality of the review and the nature of the findings.

摘要

荟萃分析是一种汇总多项研究结果的技术,它能让特定领域的综述者比单纯依靠专家意见更客观地综合各种研究结果,并将这些研究的结果结合起来,以得出对某种治疗效果大小的总体估计,从而确定证据是否支持其有效性。该技术包括为每项研究确定效应量或比值比,并在考虑到样本量大的研究应比样本量小的研究具有更大影响力这一事实的情况下,将它们合并起来。然而,这个过程并非机械的。综述者必须就纳入或排除的研究、给予试验方法严谨性的权重、要使用的每项研究的结果、如何处理不同研究结果大小的差异、如何得出各项研究效应的最佳总体估计以及如何确定该估计的精确度等做出一系列决策。这些决策中的每一个都可能影响综述的质量和研究结果的性质。

相似文献

1
Using meta-analysis in psychiatric research.在精神病学研究中使用荟萃分析。
Can J Psychiatry. 1991 Jun;36(5):357-62. doi: 10.1177/070674379103600508.
2
What is a multiple treatments meta-analysis?什么是多项治疗荟萃分析?
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Jun;21(2):151-3. doi: 10.1017/S2045796011000837.
3
Critical issues on the use of network meta-analysis in psychiatry.精神病学中网络荟萃分析应用的关键问题。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;22(6):367-72. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000025.
4
Pragmatic Precision Psychiatry-A New Direction for Optimizing Treatment Selection.实用精准精神病学:优化治疗选择的新方向。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 1;78(12):1384-1390. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2500.
5
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
6
Clinical trials in psychiatry: background and statistical perspective.精神病学中的临床试验:背景与统计学视角
Stat Methods Med Res. 1998 Sep;7(3):209-34. doi: 10.1177/096228029800700302.
7
The case against evidence-based principles in psychiatry.对精神病学中循证原则的质疑。
Med Hypotheses. 2006;67(2):401-10. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.02.025. Epub 2006 May 4.
8
Methodological challenges in constructing effective treatment sequences for chronic psychiatric disorders.构建慢性精神疾病有效治疗序列中的方法学挑战。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 Feb;32(2):257-62. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301241. Epub 2006 Nov 8.
9
Meta-analysis: a tool for clinical and experimental research in psychiatry.荟萃分析:精神病学临床与实验研究的一种工具。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2014 May;68(4):243-50. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.830773. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative summaries of single-subject studies: What do group comparisons tell us about individual performances?单病例研究的定量总结:组间比较能告诉我们个体表现的哪些信息?
Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;23(1):101-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03392004.
2
Human sensitivity to reinforcement: A comment on Kollins, Newland, and Critchfield's (1997) quantitative literature review.人类对强化的敏感性:对科林斯、纽兰和克里奇菲尔德(1997年)定量文献综述的评论。
Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;22(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/BF03391976.
3
The comorbidity of eating disorders and personality disorders: a meta-analytic review of studies published between 1983 and 1998.
饮食失调与人格障碍的共病现象:对1983年至1998年间发表的研究的元分析综述
Eat Weight Disord. 2000 Jun;5(2):52-61. doi: 10.1007/BF03327480.
4
Assessing the effectiveness of geriatric services: a proposed methodology. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.评估老年服务的有效性:一种提议的方法。加拿大定期健康检查特别工作组。
CMAJ. 1993 Mar 15;148(6):939-44.
5
REM sleep abnormalities and psychiatry.快速眼动睡眠异常与精神病学。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1994 Nov;19(5):335-44.