Clarke Mike J
UK Cochrane Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford, UK, OX2 7LG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD000486. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000486.pub2.
There have been many randomised trials of adjuvant tamoxifen among women with early breast cancer, and an updated overview of their results is presented.
In this report, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group present their third 5-yearly systematic overview (meta-analysis) of treatment with tamoxifen.
Trial identification procedures for the EBCTCG overviews have been described elsewhere. See under "EBCTCG" in the Breast Cancer Collaborative Review Group module.
All randomised trials that began before 1990 and compared adjuvant tamoxifen for any duration versus no such treatment for women with early breast cancer.
In 1995, information was sought on each woman in any randomised trial that began before 1990 of adjuvant tamoxifen versus no tamoxifen before recurrence. Information was obtained and analysed centrally on each of 37,000 women in 55 such trials, comprising about 87% of the worldwide evidence. Compared with the previous such overview, this approximately doubles the amount of evidence from trials of about 5 years of tamoxifen and, taking all trials together, on events occurring more than 5 years after randomisation.
Nearly 8000 of the women had a low, or zero, level of the oestrogen-receptor protein (ER) measured in their primary tumour. Among them, the overall effects of tamoxifen appeared to be small, and subsequent analyses of recurrence and total mortality are restricted to the remaining women (18,000 with ER-positive tumours, plus nearly 12,000 more with untested tumours, of which an estimated 8000 would have been ER-positive). For trials of 1 year, 2 years, and about 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, the proportional recurrence reductions produced among these 30,000 women during about 10 years of follow-up were 21% (SD 3), 29% (SD 2), and 47% (SD 3), respectively, with a highly significant trend towards greater effect with longer treatment (2p<0.00001). The corresponding proportional mortality reductions were 12% (SD 3), 17% (SD 3), and 26% (SD 4), respectively, and again the test for trend was significant (2p=0.003). The absolute improvement in recurrence was greater during the first 5 years, whereas the improvement in survival grew steadily larger throughout the first 10 years. The proportional mortality reductions were similar for women with node-positive and node-negative disease, but the absolute mortality reductions were greater in node-positive women. In the trials of about 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen the absolute improvements in 10-year survival were 10.9% (SD 2.5) for node-positive (61.4% vs 50.5% survival, 2p<0.00001) and 5.6% (SD 1.3) for node-negative (78.9% vs 73.3% survival, 2p<0.00001). These benefits appeared to be largely irrespective of age, menopausal status, daily tamoxifen dose (which was generally 20 mg), and of whether chemotherapy had been given to both groups. In terms of other outcomes among all women studied (ie, including those with "ER-poor" tumours), the proportional reductions in contralateral breast cancer were 13% (SD 13), 26% (SD 9), and 47% (SD 9) in the trials of 1, 2, or about 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. The incidence of endometrial cancer was approximately doubled in trials of 1 or 2 years of tamoxifen and approximately quadrupled in trials of 5 years of tamoxifen (although the number of cases was small and these ratios were not significantly different from each other). The absolute decrease in contralateral breast cancer was about twice as large as the absolute increase in the incidence of endometrial cancer. Tamoxifen had no apparent effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer or, after exclusion of deaths from breast or endometrial cancer, on any of the other main categories of cause of death (total nearly 2000 such deaths; overall relative risk 0.99 [SD 0.05]).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For women with tumours that have been reliably shown to be ER-negative, adjuvant tamoxifen remains a matter for research. However, some years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment substantially improves the 10-year survival of women with ER-positive tumours and of women whose tumours are of unknown ER status, with the proportional reductions in breast cancer recurrence and in mortality appearing to be largely unaffected by other patient characteristics or treatments.
针对早期乳腺癌女性患者,已开展了多项他莫昔芬辅助治疗的随机试验,本文呈现了这些试验结果的更新综述。
在本报告中,早期乳腺癌试验者协作组展示了他们对他莫昔芬治疗的第三次每5年进行一次的系统综述(荟萃分析)。
EBCTCG综述的试验识别程序已在其他地方进行了描述。见乳腺癌协作综述组模块中的“EBCTCG”。
所有在1990年之前开始的随机试验,这些试验比较了早期乳腺癌女性患者接受任何时长的他莫昔芬辅助治疗与未接受该治疗的情况。
1995年,我们在1990年之前开始的任何一项他莫昔芬辅助治疗与未使用他莫昔芬的随机试验中,收集了每位女性患者在复发前的信息。对55项此类试验中的37000名女性患者的信息进行了集中获取和分析,这些信息约占全球证据的87%。与之前的此类综述相比,此次纳入了约5年他莫昔芬治疗试验的证据量几乎翻倍,并且综合所有试验来看,纳入了随机分组后5年以上发生事件的证据。
近8000名女性患者的原发肿瘤中雌激素受体蛋白(ER)水平较低或为零。在这些患者中,他莫昔芬的总体效果似乎较小,随后对复发和总死亡率的分析仅限于其余患者(18000名ER阳性肿瘤患者,加上近12000名未检测肿瘤的患者,其中估计8000名可能为ER阳性)。在对1年辅助他莫昔芬治疗、2年辅助他莫昔芬治疗以及约5年辅助他莫昔芬治疗的试验中,这30000名女性患者在约10年的随访期间,复发比例分别降低了21%(标准差3)、29%(标准差2)和47%(标准差3),治疗时间越长效果越好的趋势非常显著(P<0.00001)。相应的死亡率比例分别降低了12%(标准差3)、17%(标准差3)和26%(标准差4),趋势检验也具有显著性(P=0.003)。复发的绝对改善在最初5年更大,而生存的改善在最初10年中稳步增大。淋巴结阳性和淋巴结阴性疾病患者的死亡率比例降低相似,但淋巴结阳性患者的绝对死亡率降低更大。在约5年辅助他莫昔芬治疗的试验中,淋巴结阳性患者10年生存的绝对改善为10.9%(标准差2.5)(生存率从50.5%提高到61.4%,P<0.00001),淋巴结阴性患者为5.6%(标准差1.3)(生存率从73.3%提高到78.9%,P<0.00001)。这些益处似乎在很大程度上与年龄、绝经状态、他莫昔芬每日剂量(通常为20毫克)以及两组是否接受化疗无关。在所有研究的女性患者(即包括那些“ER阴性低表达”肿瘤患者)的其他结局方面,辅助他莫昔芬治疗1年、2年或约5年的试验中,对侧乳腺癌的比例分别降低了13%(标准差13)、26%(标准差9)和47%(标准差9)。他莫昔芬治疗1年或2年的试验中,子宫内膜癌的发病率大约翻倍,他莫昔芬治疗5年的试验中大约增至四倍(尽管病例数较少且这些比例彼此无显著差异)。对侧乳腺癌的绝对减少量约为子宫内膜癌发病率绝对增加量的两倍。他莫昔芬对结直肠癌的发病率没有明显影响,并且在排除乳腺癌或子宫内膜癌导致的死亡后,对任何其他主要死因类别(总计近2000例此类死亡;总体相对风险0.99[标准差0.05])也没有影响。
对于肿瘤被可靠证明为ER阴性的女性患者,辅助他莫昔芬治疗仍有待研究。然而,数年的辅助他莫昔芬治疗可显著提高ER阳性肿瘤女性患者以及肿瘤ER状态未知女性患者的10年生存率,乳腺癌复发和死亡率的比例降低似乎在很大程度上不受其他患者特征或治疗的影响。