Clarke Mike J
UK Cochrane Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford, UK, OX2 7LG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD000487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000487.pub2.
There have been many randomised trials of adjuvant prolonged polychemotherapy among women with early breast cancer, and an updated overview of their results is presented.
In this report, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group present their updated systematic overview (meta-analysis) of treatment with polychemotherapy.
Trial identification procedures for the EBCTCG overviews have been described elsewhere. See under "EBCTCG" in the Breast Cancer Collaborative Review Group module.
All randomised trials that began before 1990 and involved treatment groups that differed only with respect to the chemotherapy regimens that were being compared.
In 1995, information was sought on each woman in any randomised trial that began before 1990 and involved treatment groups that differed only with respect to the chemotherapy regimens that were being compared. Analyses involved about 18,000 women in 47 trials of prolonged polychemotherapy versus no chemotherapy, about 6000 in 11 trials of longer versus shorter polychemotherapy, and about 6000 in 11 trials of anthracycline-containing regimens versus CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil).
For recurrence, polychemotherapy produced substantial and highly significant proportional reductions both among women aged under 50 at randomisation (35% [SD 4] reduction; 2p<0.00001) and among those aged 50-69 (20% [SD 3] reduction; 2p<0.00001); few women aged 70 or over had been studied. For mortality, the reductions were also significant both among women aged under 50 (27% [SD 5] reduction; 2p<0.00001) and among those aged 50-69 (11% [SD 3] reduction; 2p=0.0001). The recurrence reductions emerged chiefly during the first 5 years of follow-up, whereas the difference in survival grew throughout the first 10 years. After standardisation for age and time since randomisation, the proportional reductions in risk were similar for women with node-negative and node-positive disease. Applying the proportional mortality reduction observed in all women aged under 50 at randomisation would typically change a 10-year survival of 71% for those with node-negative disease to 78% (an absolute benefit of 7%), and of 42% for those with node-positive disease to 53% (an absolute benefit of 11%). The smaller proportional mortality reduction observed in all women aged 50-69 at randomisation would translate into smaller absolute benefits, changing a 10-year survival of 67% for those with node-negative disease to 69% (an absolute gain of 2%) and of 46% for those with node-positive disease to 49% (an absolute gain of 3%). The age-specific benefits of polychemotherapy appeared to be largely irrespective of menopausal status at presentation, oestrogen receptor status of the primary tumour, and of whether adjuvant tamoxifen had been given. In terms of other outcomes, there was a reduction of about one-fifth (2p=0.05) in contralateral breast cancer, which has already been included in the analyses of recurrence, and no apparent adverse effect on deaths from causes other than breast cancer (death rate ratio 0.89 [SD 0.09]). The directly randomised comparisons of longer versus shorter durations of polychemotherapy did not indicate any survival advantage with the use of more than about 3-6 months of polychemotherapy. By contrast, directly randomised comparisons did suggest that, compared with CMF alone, the anthracycline-containing regimens studied produced somewhat greater effects on recurrence (2p=0.006) and mortality (69% vs 72% 5-year survival; log-rank 2p=0.02). But this comparison is one of many that could have been selected for emphasis, the 99% CI reaches zero, and the results of several of the relevant trials are not yet available.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Some months of adjuvant polychemotherapy (eg, with CMF or an anthracycline-containing regimen) typically produces an absolute improvement of about 7-11% in 10-year survival for women aged under 50 at presentation with early breast cancer, and of about 2-3% for those aged 50-69 (unless their prognosis is likely to be extremely good even without such treatment). Treatment decisions involve consideration not only of improvements in cancer recurrence and survival but also of adverse side-effects of treatment, and this report makes no recommendations as to who should or should not be treated.
针对早期乳腺癌女性患者开展了多项辅助性延长多药化疗的随机试验,本文呈现了这些试验结果的更新综述。
在本报告中,早期乳腺癌试验者协作组展示了其关于多药化疗治疗的更新系统综述(荟萃分析)。
EBCTCG综述的试验识别程序已在其他地方描述。见乳腺癌协作综述组模块中的“EBCTCG”。
所有在1990年之前开始的随机试验,且所涉及的治疗组仅在被比较的化疗方案方面存在差异。
1995年,在1990年之前开始的、所涉及的治疗组仅在被比较的化疗方案方面存在差异的任何随机试验中,收集每位女性的信息。分析涉及47项延长多药化疗与不化疗对比试验中的约18000名女性、11项长疗程与短疗程多药化疗对比试验中的约6000名女性,以及11项含蒽环类方案与CMF(环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶)对比试验中的约6000名女性。
对于复发,多药化疗在随机分组时年龄小于50岁的女性中产生了显著且高度显著的比例降低(降低35%[标准差4];P<0.00001),在年龄50 - 69岁的女性中也如此(降低20%[标准差3];P<0.00001);70岁及以上的女性很少被研究。对于死亡率降低,在年龄小于50岁的女性中(降低27%[标准差5];P<0.00001)以及年龄50 - 69岁的女性中(降低11%[标准差3];P = 0.0001)也具有显著意义。复发降低主要出现在随访的前5年,而生存差异在整个前10年中持续增加。在对年龄和随机分组后的时间进行标准化后,淋巴结阴性和阳性疾病女性的风险比例降低相似。将随机分组时所有年龄小于50岁女性中观察到的比例死亡率降低应用于此,对于淋巴结阴性疾病患者,10年生存率通常会从71%变为78%(绝对获益7%),对于淋巴结阳性疾病患者,会从42%变为53%(绝对获益11%)。在随机分组时年龄50 - 69岁的所有女性中观察到的较小比例死亡率降低会转化为较小的绝对获益,对于淋巴结阴性疾病患者,10年生存率会从67%变为69%(绝对增加2%),对于淋巴结阳性疾病患者,会从46%变为49%(绝对增加3%)。多药化疗按年龄分层的获益似乎在很大程度上与就诊时的绝经状态、原发肿瘤的雌激素受体状态以及是否给予辅助性他莫昔芬无关。在其他结局方面,对侧乳腺癌降低了约五分之一(P = 0.05),这已包含在复发分析中,且对除乳腺癌外其他原因导致的死亡无明显不良影响(死亡率比值0.89[标准差0.09])。多药化疗长疗程与短疗程直接随机对照比较未显示使用超过约3 - 6个月的多药化疗有任何生存优势。相比之下,直接随机对照比较确实表明,与单独使用CMF相比,所研究的含蒽环类方案对复发(P = 0.006)和死亡率(5年生存率69%对7%;对数秩检验P = 0.02)有更大影响。但这种比较只是众多可被重点强调的比较之一,99%置信区间包含零,且一些相关试验的结果尚未可得。
几个月的辅助性多药化疗(如使用CMF或含蒽环类方案)通常会使初诊时年龄小于50岁的早期乳腺癌女性10年生存率绝对提高约7 - 11%,使年龄50 - 69岁的女性提高约2 - 3%(除非即使不进行这种治疗其预后也可能非常好)。治疗决策不仅要考虑癌症复发和生存的改善,还要考虑治疗的不良副作用,本报告未就谁应接受治疗或不应接受治疗给出建议。