• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在国家医疗保健系统(瑞典)内,乳腺癌生存率的社会差异与患者管理的关系。

Social differences in breast cancer survival in relation to patient management within a National Health Care System (Sweden).

作者信息

Eaker Sonja, Halmin Märit, Bellocco Rino, Bergkvist Leif, Ahlgren Johan, Holmberg Lars, Lambe Mats

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2009 Jan 1;124(1):180-7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23875.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.23875
PMID:18844231
Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have shown that cancer survival is poorer in low compared with high socioeconomic groups. We investigated whether these differences were associated with disparities in tumour characteristics and management. This cohort study was based on 9,908 women aged 20-79 years at diagnosis with primary breast cancer identified in a Swedish population-based clinical register. Information on socioeconomic standing was obtained from a social database. The 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) and mortality hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models to assess differences in survival between socioeconomic groups while adjusting for diagnostic intensity, tumour characteristics and treatment. Following adjustment for age, year and stage at diagnosis, the risk of dying of breast cancer was 35% lower among women with high education compared with that of low education (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.80). When compared with women with high education, a lower percentage of women with low education had been investigated for proliferation (84 vs. 76%) or hormone receptor status (89 vs. 81%), had tumours <or=20 mm (68 vs. 64%), were treated at a main hospital (75 vs. 68%) and had received radiation treatment (80 vs. 67%) or chemotherapy (31 vs. 18%). However, these proportional differences could not explain the observed social gradient in survival. To minimize social differences in breast cancer survival, further research should address not only factors leading to inequities in management but also focus on patient factors such as health awareness, comorbidity burden and compliance to adjuvant treatment.

摘要

流行病学研究表明,与高社会经济群体相比,低社会经济群体的癌症生存率更低。我们调查了这些差异是否与肿瘤特征和治疗方面的差异有关。这项队列研究基于瑞典一个基于人群的临床登记系统中确诊的9908名年龄在20 - 79岁的原发性乳腺癌女性。社会经济地位信息来自一个社会数据库。通过Cox比例风险模型估计5年特定病因生存率(CSS)和死亡风险比(HR),以评估社会经济群体之间的生存差异,同时调整诊断强度、肿瘤特征和治疗因素。在对年龄、诊断年份和分期进行调整后,高学历女性死于乳腺癌的风险比低学历女性低35%(HR = 0.65,95% CI 0.53 - 0.80)。与高学历女性相比,低学历女性中接受增殖情况检查(84%对76%)或激素受体状态检查(89%对81%)的比例更低,肿瘤≤20 mm的比例更低(68%对64%),在主要医院接受治疗的比例更低(75%对68%),接受放射治疗的比例更低(80%对67%)或化疗的比例更低(31%对18%)。然而,这些比例差异并不能解释观察到的生存方面的社会梯度。为了尽量减少乳腺癌生存方面的社会差异,进一步的研究不仅应关注导致治疗不平等的因素,还应关注患者因素,如健康意识、合并症负担和辅助治疗的依从性。

相似文献

1
Social differences in breast cancer survival in relation to patient management within a National Health Care System (Sweden).在国家医疗保健系统(瑞典)内,乳腺癌生存率的社会差异与患者管理的关系。
Int J Cancer. 2009 Jan 1;124(1):180-7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23875.
2
Long-term inequalities in breast cancer survival--a ten year follow-up study of patients managed within a National Health Care System (Sweden).乳腺癌生存的长期不平等——对瑞典国家医疗保健系统内接受治疗的患者进行的十年随访研究
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(2):216-24. doi: 10.1080/02841860701769768.
3
Influence of socioeconomic factors on survival after breast cancer--a nationwide cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark 1983-1999.社会经济因素对乳腺癌患者生存的影响——一项针对1983年至1999年在丹麦被诊断为乳腺癌的女性的全国性队列研究。
Int J Cancer. 2007 Dec 1;121(11):2524-31. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22979.
4
Breast cancer diagnosis and mortality by tumor stage and migration background in a nationwide cohort study in Sweden.瑞典一项全国性队列研究中按肿瘤分期和移民背景划分的乳腺癌诊断与死亡率
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Socio-economic factors and breast cancer survival--a population-based cohort study (Sweden).社会经济因素与乳腺癌生存率——一项基于人群的队列研究(瑞典)
Cancer Causes Control. 2005 May;16(4):419-30. doi: 10.1007/s10552-004-6255-7.
6
The socioeconomic gradient in all-cause mortality for women with breast cancer: findings from the 1998 to 2006 National Cancer Data Base with follow-up through 2011.乳腺癌女性全因死亡率的社会经济梯度:1998 年至 2006 年全国癌症数据库的研究结果,随访至 2011 年。
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;25(8):549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
7
Low level of education is associated with later stage at diagnosis and reduced survival in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a nationwide population-based study in Sweden.低教育水平与皮肤恶性黑色素瘤诊断时的晚期和生存率降低有关:瑞典一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Aug;49(12):2705-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
8
Investigating the correlation between hospital of primary treatment and the survival of women with breast cancer.研究初次治疗医院与乳腺癌女性患者生存率之间的相关性。
Cancer. 2005 Oct 1;104(7):1343-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21336.
9
Influence of metabolic indicators, smoking, alcohol and socioeconomic position on mortality after breast cancer.代谢指标、吸烟、饮酒及社会经济地位对乳腺癌患者死亡率的影响。
Acta Oncol. 2015 May;54(5):780-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.998774. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
10
Social inequalities in non-small cell lung cancer management and survival: a population-based study in central Sweden.社会不平等在非小细胞肺癌管理和生存中的作用:瑞典中部的一项基于人群的研究。
Thorax. 2010 Apr;65(4):327-33. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.125914.

引用本文的文献

1
The long-term conditional mortality rate in older ICU patients compared to the general population.与普通人群相比,老年 ICU 患者的长期条件死亡率。
Crit Care. 2024 Nov 14;28(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05147-z.
2
Contextual and individual inequalities in breast cancer screening participation and outcomes in Turin (North-West Italy).意大利西北部都灵乳腺癌筛查参与情况及结果中的背景和个体不平等现象
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Jun 27;10(1):51. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00660-4.
3
Cancer Treatment Closer to the Patient Reduces Travel Burden, Time Toxicity, and Improves Patient Satisfaction, Results of 546 Consecutive Patients in a Northern Italian District.
意大利北部地区 546 例连续患者的结果显示,靠近患者的癌症治疗可减少旅行负担、时间毒性并提高患者满意度。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 4;59(12):2121. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122121.
4
Optimized diagnosis-based comorbidity measures for all-cause mortality prediction in a national population-based ICU population.优化基于诊断的合并症指标,以预测全国基于人群的 ICU 人群的全因死亡率。
Crit Care. 2022 Oct 6;26(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04172-0.
5
Psychological distress and health-related quality of life among women with breast cancer: a descriptive cross-sectional study.乳腺癌患者的心理困扰和健康相关生活质量:一项描述性横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):3177-3186. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06763-z. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Factors Explaining Socio-Economic Inequalities in Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review.解释癌症生存的社会经济不平等因素:系统评价。
Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211011956. doi: 10.1177/10732748211011956.
7
Influence of adherence with guideline-driven recommendations on survival in women operated for breast cancer: Real-life evidence from Italy.意大利真实世界证据:遵循指南驱动的建议对乳腺癌患者生存的影响。
Breast. 2020 Oct;53:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
8
Relationship of Socio Economic Status, Income, and Education with the Survival Rate of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.社会经济地位、收入和教育与乳腺癌生存率的关系:一项荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2019 Aug;48(8):1428-1438.
9
Health inequities and cancer survival in Manizales, Colombia: a population-based study.哥伦比亚马尼萨莱斯的健康不平等与癌症生存率:一项基于人群的研究。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2018 Mar 30;49(1):63-72. doi: 10.25100/cm.v49i1.3629.
10
Socioeconomic status and diagnosis, treatment, and mortality in men with prostate cancer. Nationwide population-based study.社会经济地位与前列腺癌男性患者的诊断、治疗和死亡率。基于全国人口的研究。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Jun 15;142(12):2478-2484. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31272. Epub 2018 Feb 2.