Kelly A, Antonio A G, Maia L C, Luiz R R, Vianna R B C, Quintanilha L E L P
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(5):443-7.
The need to evaluate the reliability of a clinical index before using it as a research tool is clearly recognized. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate whether a new calibration method by means of photographs would be useful for assessing the examiners' reliability in the interpretation of a plaque index.
Nine children were randomly recruited from a public school in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Two trained examiners evaluated these children for dental plaque, in a classroom environment, in order to record plaque scores. The children's teeth were dyed and colored photographs were taken of all tooth surfaces using a camera, mouth mirrors and lip retractors. The photographs were evaluated to select and identify the best visible tooth surfaces, and the final sample consisted of 343 tooth surfaces. One week after the clinical examination, both examiners scored the tooth surfaces from the photographs according to the index used. The intra and inter-examiner agreements were measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for individual mean scores and for tooth surfaces scores.
The data showed an excellent agreement (ICC >0.80) between clinical and photographic examinations, for both examiners, both for tooth surface and patient analysis. The statistics also demonstrated excellent (ICC >0.80) inter-examiner agreement on clinical and photographic examinations.
The method seems to be an effective technique to evaluate the reliability of the plaque index, improving the reproducibility of epidemiological studies.
在将临床指标用作研究工具之前,评估其可靠性的必要性已得到明确认可。因此,本研究的目的是评估一种通过照片进行的新校准方法是否有助于评估检查者在解读菌斑指数方面的可靠性。
从巴西里约热内卢的一所公立学校随机招募了9名儿童。两名经过培训的检查者在教室环境中对这些儿童的牙菌斑进行评估,以记录菌斑分数。给孩子们的牙齿染色,使用相机、口镜和唇牵开器对所有牙面拍摄彩色照片。对照片进行评估,以选择和识别最佳可视牙面,最终样本包括343个牙面。临床检查一周后,两名检查者根据所使用的指数对照片中的牙面进行评分。通过组内相关系数(ICC)测量检查者内部和检查者之间在个体平均分数和牙面分数方面的一致性。
数据显示,对于两名检查者,无论是牙面分析还是患者分析,临床检查和照片检查之间均具有极佳的一致性(ICC>0.80)。统计数据还表明,检查者之间在临床检查和照片检查方面也具有极佳的一致性(ICC>0.80)。
该方法似乎是评估菌斑指数可靠性的有效技术,可提高流行病学研究的可重复性。