Al Jaghsi Ahmad, Mundt Torsten, Biffar Reiner
Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Jul/Aug;30(4):377-383. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5253.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and agreement of a new computerized planimetric method (CPM) for the measurement and assessment of plaque on all types of removable dental prostheses (RDPs).
From a database containing 780 images taken following a standardized method for 65 RDPs, 55 images were randomly selected for image analysis. Adobe Photoshop software was used according to standard operating procedure (SOP) by one main examiner two times in different sessions, and one time by three additional examiners. To estimate the intra- and interexaminer reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient ICC were used. Three parameters were used to estimate agreement: standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change at the 95% confidence level (SDC), and limits of agreement (LoA) according to the Bland-Altman method.
In all steps of the image analysis, both intra- and interexaminer reliability were excellent, with ICC values > 0.85 at the 95% confidence level. The intra- and interexaminer values for both the SEM and SDC were ≤ 6% and ≤ 17%, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a satisfactory level of agreement.
This study shows excellent inter- and intraexaminer reproducibility, a satisfactory level of examiner agreement, and acceptable measurement error. Furthermore, the method can be used with all types of RDPs. The CPM is more suitable for clinical research because of its objectivity, reliability, high level of standardization, and ability to detect and quantify small changes in plaque.
本研究旨在评估一种新的计算机平面测量方法(CPM)用于测量和评估各类可摘局部义齿(RDP)上菌斑的可靠性和一致性。
从一个包含按照标准化方法为65副RDP拍摄的780张图像的数据库中,随机选择55张图像进行图像分析。一名主考官按照标准操作程序(SOP)在不同时间段使用Adobe Photoshop软件进行两次分析,另外三名考官各进行一次分析。为评估考官内和考官间的可靠性,使用组内相关系数ICC。使用三个参数来评估一致性:测量标准误(SEM)、95%置信水平下的最小可检测变化(SDC)以及根据Bland-Altman方法得出的一致性界限(LoA)。
在图像分析的所有步骤中,考官内和考官间的可靠性均极佳,在95%置信水平下ICC值>0.85。SEM和SDC的考官内和考官间值分别≤6%和≤17%。Bland-Altman分析显示一致性水平令人满意。
本研究表明考官间和考官内具有出色的可重复性、令人满意的考官一致性水平以及可接受的测量误差。此外,该方法可用于所有类型的RDP。由于其客观性、可靠性、高度标准化以及检测和量化菌斑微小变化的能力,CPM更适合临床研究。