Conley D S, Cureton K J, Dengel D R, Weyand P G
Department of Physical Education, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Jun;23(6):766-73.
The purposes of this study were to validate the 12-min swim as a field test of VO2max and to compare its validity with that of the 12-min run. Thirty-six young men completed 12-min swim, 12-min run, tethered swimming (TS) VO2peak, and treadmill running (TR) VO2peak tests within 3 wk. Mean (+/- SD) 12-min swim and run distances were 581 +/- 88 and 2797 +/- 290 m, and mean TS and TR VO2peak values were 50.3 +/- 6.2 and 57.2 +/- 5.5 ml.kg BW-1.min-1, respectively. Correlation coefficients and standard errors of estimate for predictions of TS VO2peak from the 12-min swim (0.40 and 5.7 ml.kg BW-1.min-1) and run (0.74 and 4.2 ml.kg BW-1.min-1) and for predictions of TR VO2peak from the 12-min swim (0.38 and 5.1 ml.kg BW-1.min-1) and run (0.88 and 2.6 ml.kg BW-1.min-1) indicated that the 12-min run was a more accurate predictor of TS or TR VO2peak than the 12-min swim. We conclude that the 12-min swim has relatively low validity as a field test of peak aerobic power and that it should not be considered an equally valid alternative to the 12-min run in young male recreational swimmers. However, the accuracy of predicting VO2peak from the 12-min swim is as good as some other commonly used methods, and, therefore, it may be adequate for fitness classification in situations in which a high level of accuracy is not needed.
本研究的目的是验证12分钟游泳作为最大摄氧量(VO2max)的一项现场测试的有效性,并将其有效性与12分钟跑步的有效性进行比较。36名年轻男性在3周内完成了12分钟游泳、12分钟跑步、系绳游泳(TS)最大摄氧量测试以及跑步机跑步(TR)最大摄氧量测试。12分钟游泳和跑步的平均(±标准差)距离分别为581±88米和2797±290米,TS和TR最大摄氧量的平均值分别为50.3±6.2和57.2±5.5毫升·千克体重-1·分钟-1。从12分钟游泳(0.40和5.7毫升·千克体重-1·分钟-1)和跑步(0.74和4.2毫升·千克体重-1·分钟-1)预测TS最大摄氧量以及从12分钟游泳(0.38和5.1毫升·千克体重-1·分钟-1)和跑步(0.88和2.6毫升·千克体重-1·分钟-1)预测TR最大摄氧量的相关系数和估计标准误差表明,12分钟跑步比12分钟游泳更能准确预测TS或TR最大摄氧量。我们得出结论,12分钟游泳作为有氧峰值功率的现场测试,其有效性相对较低,在年轻男性休闲游泳者中,不应将其视为12分钟跑步的同等有效替代方法。然而,从12分钟游泳预测最大摄氧量的准确性与其他一些常用方法相当,因此,在不需要高精度的情况下,它可能足以用于体能分类。