Gergley T J, McArdle W D, DeJesus P, Toner M M, Jacobowitz S, Spina R J
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984 Aug;16(4):349-54.
The specificity of aerobic training for upper-body exercise requiring differing amounts of muscle mass was evaluated in 25 college-aged male recreational swimmers who were randomly assigned to either a non-training control group (N = 9), a 10-wk swim(S)-training group (N = 9), or a group that trained with a standard swim-bench pulley system (SB; N = 7). For all subjects prior to training, tethered-swimming peak VO2 averaged 19% below treadmill values (P less than 0.01), while SB-ergometry peak VO2 was 50% and 39% below running and swimming values, respectively (P less than 0.01). Significant (P less than 0.01) increases of peak VO2 in tethered swimming (11%) and SB (21%) were observed for the SB-trained group, while the S-trained group improved (P less than 0.01) 18% and 19% on the tethered swimming and SB tests, respectively. No changes were observed during treadmill running, and the control subjects remained unchanged on all measures. Comparisons between training groups indicated that although both groups improved to a similar extent when measured on the swim bench, the 0.53 l X min-1 improvement in tethered-swimming peak VO2 for the S-trained group was greater (P less than 0.05) than the 0.32 l X min-1 increase noted for the SB-trained group. The comparisons between SB and S exercise vs treadmill exercise support the specificity of aerobic improvement with training and suggest that local adaptations contribute significantly to improvements in peak VO2. Furthermore, the present data indicate that SB exercise activates a considerable portion of the musculature involved in swimming, and that aerobic improvements with SB training are directly transferred to swimming.
对25名大学年龄的男性休闲游泳者进行了评估,以确定有氧训练对需要不同肌肉量的上身运动的特异性。这些游泳者被随机分为非训练对照组(N = 9)、10周游泳(S)训练组(N = 9)或使用标准游泳长凳滑轮系统训练的组(SB;N = 7)。在训练前,所有受试者的系绳游泳峰值VO2平均比跑步机值低19%(P < 0.01),而SB测力计峰值VO2分别比跑步和游泳值低50%和39%(P < 0.01)。SB训练组在系绳游泳(11%)和SB(21%)中的峰值VO2有显著(P < 0.01)增加,而S训练组在系绳游泳和SB测试中分别提高了18%和19%(P < 0.01)。在跑步机跑步过程中未观察到变化,对照组在所有测量指标上均保持不变。训练组之间的比较表明,尽管两组在游泳长凳上测量时改善程度相似,但S训练组在系绳游泳峰值VO2上0.53 l·min-1的改善大于SB训练组记录的0.32 l·min-1的增加(P < 0.05)。SB和S运动与跑步机运动之间的比较支持了有氧训练改善的特异性,并表明局部适应性对峰值VO2的改善有显著贡献。此外,目前的数据表明,SB运动激活了游泳中涉及的相当一部分肌肉组织,并且SB训练带来的有氧改善直接转移到了游泳中。