Stassen H H, Bomben G, Günther E
Research Department, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Psychopathology. 1991;24(2):88-105. doi: 10.1159/000284700.
This study examined the relationship between speech characteristics and psychopathology throughout the course of affective disturbances. Our sample comprised 20 depressive, hospitalized patients who had been selected according to the following criteria: (1) first admission; (2) long-term patient; (3) early entry into study; (4) late entry into study; (5) low scorer; (6) high scorer, and (7) distinct retarded-depressive symptomatology. Since our principal goal was to model the course of affective disturbances in terms of speech parameters, a total of 6 repeated measurements had been carried out over a 2-week period, including 3 different psychopathological instruments and speech recordings from automatic speech as well as from reading out loud. It turned out that neither applicability nor efficiency of single-parameter models depend in any way on the given, clinically defined subgroups. On the other hand, however, no significant differences between the clinically defined subgroups showed up with regard to basic speech parameters, except for the fact that low scorers seemed to take their time when producing utterances (this in contrast to all other patients who, on the average, had a considerably shorter recording time). As to the relationship between psychopathology and speech parameters over time, we found significant correlations: (1) in 60% of cases between the apathic syndrome and energy/dynamics; (2) in 50% of cases between the retarded-depressive syndrome and energy/dynamics; (3) in 45% of cases between the apathic syndrome and mean vocal pitch, and (4) in 71% of low scores between the somatic-depressive syndrome and time duration of pauses. All in all, single parameter models turned out to cover only specific aspects of the individual courses of affective disturbances, thus speaking against a simple approach which applies in general.
本研究考察了情感障碍病程中言语特征与精神病理学之间的关系。我们的样本包括20名因以下标准入选的住院抑郁症患者:(1)首次入院;(2)长期住院患者;(3)早期进入研究;(4)晚期进入研究;(5)低分者;(6)高分者;(7)明显的迟滞性抑郁症状。由于我们的主要目标是根据言语参数对情感障碍病程进行建模,因此在两周内共进行了6次重复测量,包括3种不同的精神病理学工具以及自动言语和大声朗读的语音记录。结果表明,单参数模型的适用性和效率在任何方面都不依赖于给定的临床定义亚组。然而,另一方面,除了低分者在发声时似乎花费时间较长这一事实外(与所有其他患者相比,其他患者平均录音时间要短得多),临床定义亚组在基本言语参数方面没有显示出显著差异。关于精神病理学与言语参数随时间的关系,我们发现了显著的相关性:(1)在60%的病例中,情感淡漠综合征与能量/动力之间存在相关性;(2)在50%的病例中,迟滞性抑郁综合征与能量/动力之间存在相关性;(3)在45%的病例中,情感淡漠综合征与平均音调之间存在相关性;(4)在71%的低分病例中,躯体性抑郁综合征与停顿持续时间之间存在相关性。总而言之,单参数模型仅涵盖了情感障碍个体病程的特定方面,因此反对一般适用的简单方法。