Suppr超能文献

机械通气患者呼吸道感染的抗生素预防。一项关于新型方案效果的前瞻性、双盲、随机试验。

Antibiotic prophylaxis of respiratory tract infection in mechanically ventilated patients. A prospective, blinded, randomized trial of the effect of a novel regimen.

作者信息

Aerdts S J, van Dalen R, Clasener H A, Festen J, van Lier H J, Vollaard E J

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Chest. 1991 Sep;100(3):783-91. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.3.783.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a novel regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of lower respiratory tract infection in patients requiring prolonged (at least five days) mechanical ventilation. The design was a controlled, prospective, randomized trial, with blinded comparison of the groups regarding the incidence of respiratory tract infection in an intensive care unit of a university hospital. After determination of the APACHE II score for severity of disease, 88 patients were randomly divided in three groups. Twenty-four of these patients did not complete five days of mechanical ventilation, and eight were withdrawn for other reasons. Fifty-six patients (18 in group 1, 21 in group 2, 17 in group 3) completed the study. Patients in both control groups 1 and 2 did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis, but the two groups differed in the antibiotic policy in case of infection. Patients in group 3 received antibiotic prophylaxis consisting of norfloxacin, polymyxin E, and amphotericin B, applied topically in oropharynx and stomach from time of ICU admission until extubation, and intravenous cefotaxime 500 mg three times a day during the first five days of admission. In both control groups, about 90 percent of the patients acquired microbial colonization of oropharynx or stomach. In group 3, only 12 percent and 24 percent of the patients acquired colonization of oropharynx and stomach, respectively (p less than 0.001). This resulted in a reduction of the incidence of lower respiratory tract infection (78 percent in group 1, 62 percent in group 2, 6 percent in group 3 [p = 0.0001]). The regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis studied prevented respiratory tract infection in mechanically ventilated patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered in all patients expected to require prolonged mechanical ventilation.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估一种新型抗生素预防方案对需要长期(至少五天)机械通气的患者下呼吸道感染发生率的影响。研究设计为对照、前瞻性、随机试验,在一所大学医院的重症监护病房中,对各研究组的呼吸道感染发生率进行盲法比较。在确定疾病严重程度的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)得分后,88例患者被随机分为三组。其中24例患者未完成五天的机械通气,8例因其他原因退出研究。56例患者(第1组18例,第2组21例,第3组17例)完成了研究。对照组1和对照组2的患者均未接受抗生素预防,但两组在感染时的抗生素使用策略有所不同。第3组患者接受的抗生素预防方案包括诺氟沙星、多粘菌素E和两性霉素B,从入住重症监护病房直至拔管期间,在口咽部和胃局部应用,入院头五天每天静脉注射头孢噻肟500毫克,每日三次。在两个对照组中,约90%的患者发生了口咽部或胃部的微生物定植。在第3组中,分别只有12%和24%的患者发生了口咽部和胃部的定植(p<0.001)。这使得下呼吸道感染的发生率降低(第1组为78%,第2组为62%,第3组为6%[p = 0.0001])。所研究的抗生素预防方案可预防机械通气患者的呼吸道感染。对于所有预计需要长期机械通气的患者,均应考虑进行抗生素预防。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验