Griffith M J, de Belder M A, Mehta D, Ward D E, Camm A J
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, U.K.
Eur Heart J. 1991 Jul;12(7):777-83. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/12.7.777.
The diagnosis of the origin of a broad complex tachycardia may be difficult, especially in the absence of a 12-lead electrocardiogram of the tachycardia. This study investigates the value of signal averaging in the differential diagnosis of broad complex tachycardia. Signal averaging during sinus rhythm was performed in 102 consecutive patients who presented with broad complex tachycardia (QRS width greater than 110 ms), in whom a definitive electrophysiological diagnosis was made. The presence of late potentials was determined on the basis of two definitions, the second including total QRS duration. The patients studied included 75 with ventricular tachycardia; 33 of these patients had suffered previous myocardial infarction, five had dilated cardiomyopathy, and 37 had a 'normal' heart. Of the 27 patients with supraventricular tachycardia, 22 had an atrioventricular accessory pathway (seven with a delta wave in sinus rhythm), three had atrioventricular nodal tachycardia and two had atrial tachycardia. The sensitivity of late potentials for the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia was low utilizing both definitions (28% and 45%) although specificity was high (96% and 95%). The sensitivity for the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia was higher for patients with ischaemic heart disease (43% and 70%) but very low for patients with ventricular tachycardia and a normal heart (16% and 22%). In conclusion, signal averaging in the remote diagnosis of broad complex tachycardia is specific but not sensitive for ventricular tachycardia, which limits its usefulness in selecting patients for electrophysiological study.
宽QRS波心动过速起源的诊断可能较为困难,尤其是在缺乏心动过速发作时12导联心电图的情况下。本研究探讨了信号平均技术在宽QRS波心动过速鉴别诊断中的价值。对102例连续出现宽QRS波心动过速(QRS波宽度大于110毫秒)且已明确电生理诊断的患者,在窦性心律时进行了信号平均检查。根据两种定义来确定是否存在晚电位,第二种定义包括总QRS波时限。研究的患者包括75例室性心动过速患者;其中33例曾有过心肌梗死,5例有扩张型心肌病,37例心脏“正常”。在27例室上性心动过速患者中,22例有房室旁路(7例在窦性心律时有预激波),3例有房室结折返性心动过速,2例有房性心动过速。采用两种定义时,晚电位对室性心动过速诊断的敏感性均较低(分别为28%和45%),尽管特异性较高(分别为96%和95%)。缺血性心脏病患者室性心动过速诊断的敏感性较高(分别为43%和70%),但心脏正常的室性心动过速患者敏感性很低(分别为16%和22%)。总之,信号平均技术对宽QRS波心动过速进行远程诊断时,对室性心动过速具有特异性但不敏感,这限制了其在选择患者进行电生理检查方面的实用性。