Walker A R, Whynes D K, Chamberlain J O, Hardcastle J D
Department of Surgery, University of Nottingham, London, England.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(9):907-14. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90053-c.
Diagnosis for colorectal cancer is commonly made using either colonoscopy or double contrast barium enema techniques. To data, little attention has been paid to the comparative costs of these two procedures and the paper presents estimates of hospital costs for each, using data from the colorectal study being undertaken in Nottingham, U.K. Consideration is also given to procedure sensitivity and the frequency of referral to the alternative technique in cases of incomplete diagnosis. The paper presents the conditions under which a given technique may be considered cost-superior to its alternative but concludes that the absence of conclusive clinical trial data and other considerations precludes the identification of a definitively optimum technique from the economic point of view.
结直肠癌的诊断通常采用结肠镜检查或双重对比钡灌肠技术。到目前为止,人们很少关注这两种检查方法的成本比较。本文利用英国诺丁汉正在进行的结直肠癌研究数据,给出了每种检查方法的医院成本估算。同时还考虑了检查的敏感性以及在诊断不完整的情况下转诊至另一种技术的频率。本文提出了在何种情况下一种特定技术可能被认为在成本上优于另一种技术,但得出的结论是,由于缺乏确凿的临床试验数据和其他因素,从经济角度无法确定一种绝对最优的技术。