• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于客观和主观任务难度水平的学龄前儿童任务选择分析

[Analyses of preschool children's task choices based on the objective and subjective task difficulty levels].

作者信息

Tanaka S

出版信息

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1991 Apr;62(1):46-9. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.62.46.

DOI:10.4992/jjpsy.62.46
PMID:1890786
Abstract

In this experiment, younger (4-year-olds) and older (6-year-olds) preschool children's task choices were analyzed based on the objective and subjective task difficulty levels. First, preschool children's understanding of the objective task difficulty levels was examined. While most older children understood the objective task difficulty levels, younger children did not. No understandable children's subjective task difficulty levels were checked. Next, younger and older children's task choices were analyzed respectively based on the objective task difficulty levels. As a result, there was no difference between an easy task choice and a moderate or a difficult task choice in both of them. Then, understandable children's task choices were reanalyzed based on the objective task difficulty levels and no understandable children's task choices were reanalyzed based on their subjective task difficulty levels. As a result, younger children chose an easy task more than a moderate or a difficult task. On the other hand, older children chose a moderate or a difficult task more than an easy one.

摘要

在本实验中,根据客观和主观任务难度水平对年幼(4岁)和年长(6岁)的学龄前儿童的任务选择进行了分析。首先,考察了学龄前儿童对客观任务难度水平的理解。虽然大多数年长儿童理解客观任务难度水平,但年幼儿童却不理解。没有检查儿童对主观任务难度水平的理解情况。接下来,分别根据客观任务难度水平对年幼和年长儿童的任务选择进行了分析。结果,他们在选择简单任务和中等难度或困难任务之间没有差异。然后,根据客观任务难度水平对理解能力正常的儿童的任务选择重新进行了分析,并且没有根据主观任务难度水平对理解能力正常的儿童的任务选择重新进行分析。结果,年幼儿童选择简单任务的次数多于选择中等难度或困难任务的次数。另一方面,年长儿童选择中等难度或困难任务的次数多于选择简单任务的次数。

相似文献

1
[Analyses of preschool children's task choices based on the objective and subjective task difficulty levels].基于客观和主观任务难度水平的学龄前儿童任务选择分析
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1991 Apr;62(1):46-9. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.62.46.
2
The impact of age, ongoing task difficulty, and cue salience on preschoolers' prospective memory performance: the role of executive function.年龄、当前任务难度和线索显著性对学龄前儿童前瞻记忆表现的影响:执行功能的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Nov;127:52-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
3
Examining construct validity of a new naturalistic observational assessment of hand skills for preschool- and school-age children.检验一种针对学龄前和学龄儿童手部技能的新型自然观察评估方法的结构效度。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Apr;59(2):108-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2012.00997.x. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
4
Improving children's affective decision making in the Children's Gambling Task.改善儿童在儿童赌博任务中的情感决策。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Nov;139:18-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
5
Halloween Costume Choices: Reflections of Gender Development in Early Childhood.万圣节服装选择:幼儿期性别发展的反映
J Genet Psychol. 2017 May-Jun;178(3):165-178. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2017.1295223. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
If you don't want it, neither do I: Social influences on children's choices.如果你不想要它,我也不想要:社会对儿童选择的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;141:283-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
7
Behavior and parental expectations of child pedestrians.儿童行人的行为及父母期望
Pediatrics. 1992 Mar;89(3):486-90.
8
Do hedonic- versus nutrition-based attitudes toward food predict food choices? a cross-sectional study of 6- to 11-year-olds.基于享乐主义与营养的食物态度能否预测食物选择?一项针对6至11岁儿童的横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Nov 25;14(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0618-4.
9
Why do children lack the flexibility to innovate tools?为什么儿童缺乏创新工具的灵活性?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Aug;109(4):497-511. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
10
Can children resist making interpretations when uncertain?孩子们在不确定时能忍住不做解读吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Apr;99(4):252-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Jul 27.