Suppr超能文献

格列酮类药物的不良反应与诱发的睾酮缺乏有关吗?

Are the adverse effects of glitazones linked to induced testosterone deficiency?

作者信息

Carruthers M, Trinick T R, Jankowska E, Traish A M

机构信息

Centre for Men's Health, 20/20 Harley Street, London, UK.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2008 Oct 15;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-7-30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse side-effects of the glitazones have been frequently reported in both clinical and animal studies, especially with rosiglitazone (RGZ) and pioglitazone (PGZ), including congestive heart failure, osteoporosis, weight gain, oedema and anaemia. These led to consideration of an evidence-based hypothesis which would explain these diverse effects, and further suggested novel approaches by which this hypothesis could be tested.

PRESENTATION OF HYPOTHESIS

The literature on the clinical, metabolic and endocrine effects of glitazones in relation to the reported actions of testosterone in diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease is reviewed, and the following unifying hypothesis advanced: "Glitazones induce androgen deficiency in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus resulting in pathophysiological changes in multiple tissues and organs which may explain their observed clinical adverse effects." This also provides further evidence for the lipocentric concept of diabetes and its clinical implications.

TESTING OF THE HYPOTHESIS

Clinical studies to investigate the endocrine profiles, including measurements of TT, DHT, SHBG, FT and estradiol, together with LH and FSH, in both men and women with T2DM before and after RGZ and PGZ treatment in placebo controlled groups, are necessary to provide data to substantiate this hypothesis. Also, studies on T treatment in diabetic men would further establish if the adverse effects of glitazones could be reversed or ameliorated by androgen therapy. Basic sciences investigations on the inhibition of androgen biosynthesis by glitazones are also warranted.

IMPLICATIONS OF THE HYPOTHESIS

Glitazones reduce androgen biosynthesis, increase their binding to SHBG, and attenuate androgen receptor activation, thus reducing the physiological actions of testosterone, causing relative and absolute androgen deficiency. This hypothesis explains the adverse effects of glitazones on the heart and other organs resulting from reversal of the action of androgens in directing the maturation of stem cells towards muscle, vascular endothelium, erythroid stem cells and osteoblasts, and away from adipocyte differentiation. The higher incidence of side-effects with RGZ than PGZ, may be explained by a detailed study of the mechanism by which glitazones down-regulate androgen biosynthesis and action, resulting in a state of androgen deficiency.

摘要

背景

在临床和动物研究中,噻唑烷二酮类药物的不良反应屡有报道,尤其是罗格列酮(RGZ)和吡格列酮(PGZ),包括充血性心力衰竭、骨质疏松、体重增加、水肿和贫血。这些情况促使人们思考一个基于证据的假说,以解释这些多样的效应,并进一步提出可以检验该假说的新方法。

假说陈述

回顾了有关噻唑烷二酮类药物在临床、代谢和内分泌方面的效应以及睾酮在糖尿病、代谢综合征和心血管疾病中的已知作用的文献,并提出了以下统一假说:“噻唑烷二酮类药物导致2型糖尿病患者雄激素缺乏,从而引起多个组织和器官的病理生理变化,这或许可以解释观察到的临床不良反应。”这也为以脂肪为中心的糖尿病概念及其临床意义提供了进一步证据。

假说检验

有必要开展临床研究,在安慰剂对照组中,对使用RGZ和PGZ治疗前后的男性和女性2型糖尿病患者的内分泌谱进行调查,包括测量总睾酮(TT)、双氢睾酮(DHT)、性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)、游离睾酮(FT)和雌二醇,以及促黄体生成素(LH)和促卵泡生成素(FSH),以提供数据证实这一假说。此外,针对糖尿病男性患者进行睾酮治疗的研究,将进一步确定雄激素疗法是否能够逆转或改善噻唑烷二酮类药物的不良反应。对噻唑烷二酮类药物抑制雄激素生物合成的基础科学研究也很有必要。

假说的意义

噻唑烷二酮类药物减少雄激素生物合成,增加其与SHBG的结合,并减弱雄激素受体激活,从而降低睾酮的生理作用,导致相对和绝对的雄激素缺乏。该假说解释了噻唑烷二酮类药物对心脏和其他器官的不良反应,这是由于雄激素在引导干细胞向肌肉、血管内皮、红系干细胞和成骨细胞成熟以及远离脂肪细胞分化方面的作用发生了逆转。RGZ比PGZ副作用发生率更高,这一点或许可以通过对噻唑烷二酮类药物下调雄激素生物合成和作用的机制进行详细研究来解释,这会导致一种雄激素缺乏状态。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验