Herman M P, Svatek R S, Lotan Y, Karakiewizc P I, Shariat S F
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2008 Dec;60(4):217-35.
Bladder cancer has a very high frequency of recurrence and therefore requires lifelong surveillance, traditionally consisting of serial cystoscopy and cytology. These tests are both invasive and expensive, with considerable inter-user and inter-institutional variability. In addition, the sensitivity of cytology in detecting low-grade tumors is low. Therefore, there has been active investigation into urinary biomarkers that can either supplement or supplant these tests. At this point there are only six urine-based tests that are FDA-approved in bladder cancer surveillance, but a wide variety of other biomarkers are being studied. In this review, we examine the natural history of bladder cancer as well as the rationale and performance of an ideal urinary biomarker. The authors describe the FDA-approved biomarkers such as Bladder Tumor Antigen, ImmunoCyt, Nuclear Matrix Protein-22, and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, as well as the most promising investigational tests (i.e., Urinary bladder cancer test, BLCA-1, BLCA-4, hyaluronic acid, hyaluronidase, Lewis X antigen, microsatellite analysis, Quanticyt, soluble Fas, Survivin, and telomerase). The biological foundation, methodologies, and diagnostic performance of the biomarkers are discussed. The characteristics of the biomarkers are compared to urine cytology. At this time, urine biomarkers are utilized in a variety of clinical situations but their role is not well defined. The goal of identifying an optimal marker that will replace cystoscopy and/or cytology is still ongoing.
膀胱癌的复发率非常高,因此需要终身监测,传统监测方法包括系列膀胱镜检查和细胞学检查。这些检查既具有侵入性,成本又高,且使用者和机构间差异很大。此外,细胞学检查检测低级别肿瘤的敏感性较低。因此,人们一直在积极研究可补充或替代这些检查的尿液生物标志物。目前,在膀胱癌监测中仅有六种基于尿液的检查获得了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的批准,但还有各种各样的其他生物标志物正在研究中。在本综述中,我们研究了膀胱癌的自然病史以及理想尿液生物标志物的基本原理和性能。作者描述了FDA批准的生物标志物,如膀胱肿瘤抗原、免疫细胞化学法、核基质蛋白-22和荧光原位杂交,以及最具前景的研究性检查(即膀胱癌尿液检测、BLCA-1、BLCA-4、透明质酸、透明质酸酶、Lewis X抗原、微卫星分析、定量细胞学、可溶性Fas、生存素和端粒酶)。讨论了这些生物标志物的生物学基础、方法和诊断性能。将这些生物标志物的特征与尿液细胞学进行了比较。目前,尿液生物标志物在多种临床情况下都有应用,但其作用尚未明确界定。寻找一种能替代膀胱镜检查和/或细胞学检查的最佳标志物的目标仍在继续。