• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

霉酚酸酯与硫唑嘌呤用于狼疮性肾炎维持治疗的比较

Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in the maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis.

作者信息

Sahin Gulizar Manga, Sahin Sevgi, Kiziltas Safak, Masatlioglu Seval, Oguz Fusun, Ergin Hulya

机构信息

Goztepe Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Ren Fail. 2008;30(9):865-9. doi: 10.1080/08860220802353843.

DOI:10.1080/08860220802353843
PMID:18925525
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal involvement is one of the major determinants of the outcome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Renal involvement contributes to both morbidity and mortality of the patients as well as indirectly through side effects of therapy directed at the renal lesions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in the maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients from our center with diagnosed lupus nephritis World Health Organization Class III, IV, V were treated with IVC (0.75-1g/month) for six months in addition to steroid therapy, and then with AZA (n = 15) or MMF (n = 17) as a maintenance therapy. The efficacy of two drugs was compared with changes in serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, 24 hour urine protein excretion, cholesterol, anti-dsDNA antibody, and urine sediment.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 41.5 + 7 months. The total remission occurred in 84% of patients (82% with MMF and 87% with AZA), with a complete remission rate of 59.3% (58% with MMF and 60% with AZA) and a partial remission rate of 25% (22% with MMF and 27% with AZA). The urinary protein excretion before MMF treatment was 1.9 + 1 g/dL and decreased significantly to 0.91 + 0.6 g/dL (p = 0.028) after treatment, and decreased from 1.58 + 0.7 g/dL to 0.4 + 0.23 g/dL in the AZA group (p = 0.04). The serum creatinine level decreased from 1.32 + 0.7 mg/dL to 1.12 + 0.68 mg/dL in the MMF group (p = 0.23), and decreased from 0.91 + 0.23 mg/dL to 0.88 + 0.23 mg/dL in the AZA group (p = 0.49). There was no significant change between two groups (p = 0.1). The serum cholesterol decreased from 229 + 57 mg/dL to 171 + 9 mg/dL (p = 0.002), and serum triglyceride level decreased from 228 + 116 mg/dL to 98 + 35 mg/dL (p = 0.004) in the MMF treatment, but no significant change was seen in AZA group. There was no significant difference between the two groups considering the rates of doubling of serum creatinine, progression to end-stage renal failure, relapses, and documented side effects, as well.

CONCLUSION

Both therapeutic approaches with MMF or AZA, in combination with corticosteroids, are effective as a maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis.

摘要

背景

肾脏受累是系统性红斑狼疮患者预后的主要决定因素之一。肾脏受累不仅会导致患者发病和死亡,还会通过针对肾脏病变的治疗副作用间接产生影响。本研究的目的是评估霉酚酸酯(MMF)和硫唑嘌呤(AZA)在狼疮性肾炎维持治疗中的疗效。

方法

我们中心的32例确诊为世界卫生组织III、IV、V级狼疮性肾炎的患者,除接受类固醇治疗外,还接受了静脉环磷酰胺(IVC,0.75 - 1g/月)治疗6个月,然后分别接受AZA(n = 15)或MMF(n = 17)作为维持治疗。通过比较血清肌酐、肌酐清除率、24小时尿蛋白排泄、胆固醇、抗双链DNA抗体和尿沉渣的变化来评估两种药物的疗效。

结果

平均随访时间为41.5 ± 7个月。84%的患者实现了完全缓解(MMF组为82%,AZA组为87%),完全缓解率为59.3%(MMF组为58%,AZA组为60%),部分缓解率为25%(MMF组为22%,AZA组为27%)。MMF治疗前尿蛋白排泄为1.9 ± 1g/dL,治疗后显著降至0.91 ± 0.6g/dL(p = 0.028),AZA组从1.58 ± 0.7g/dL降至0.4 ± 0.23g/dL(p = 0.04)。MMF组血清肌酐水平从1.32 ± 0.7mg/dL降至1.12 ± 0.68mg/dL(p = 0.23),AZA组从0.91 ± 0.23mg/dL降至0.88 ± 0.23mg/dL(p = 0.49)。两组之间无显著变化(p = 0.1)。MMF治疗后血清胆固醇从229 ± 57mg/dL降至171 ± 9mg/dL(p = 0.002),血清甘油三酯水平从228 ± 116mg/dL降至98 ± 35mg/dL(p = 0.004),而AZA组未见显著变化。在血清肌酐翻倍率、进展至终末期肾衰竭、复发率和记录的副作用发生率方面,两组之间也无显著差异。

结论

MMF或AZA与皮质类固醇联合使用的两种治疗方法,作为狼疮性肾炎的维持治疗均有效。

相似文献

1
Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in the maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis.霉酚酸酯与硫唑嘌呤用于狼疮性肾炎维持治疗的比较
Ren Fail. 2008;30(9):865-9. doi: 10.1080/08860220802353843.
2
Comparison of Lupus Nephritis Induction Treatments in a Hispanic Population: A Single-center Cohort Analysis.西班牙裔人群狼疮性肾炎诱导治疗的比较:单中心队列分析
J Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;42(11):2082-91. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150395. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
3
Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis.霉酚酸酯与硫唑嘌呤作为狼疮性肾炎维持治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2013 Feb;18(2):104-10. doi: 10.1111/nep.12006.
4
Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil for induction therapy of lupus nephritis: a randomised controlled trial and long-term follow-up.他克莫司与霉酚酸酯治疗狼疮性肾炎诱导缓解的随机对照试验及长期随访
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):30-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206456. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
5
Long-term study of mycophenolate mofetil as continuous induction and maintenance treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis.霉酚酸酯作为弥漫性增殖性狼疮性肾炎持续诱导和维持治疗的长期研究。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Apr;16(4):1076-84. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004080686. Epub 2005 Feb 23.
6
Long-term outcomes of lupus nephritis treated with regimens based on cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil.基于环磷酰胺和霉酚酸酯的方案治疗狼疮肾炎的长期结局。
Lupus. 2020 Jul;29(8):845-853. doi: 10.1177/0961203320926256. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
Maintenance therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis: mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and intravenous cyclophosphamide.增殖性狼疮性肾炎的维持治疗:霉酚酸酯、硫唑嘌呤和静脉注射环磷酰胺。
Lupus. 2005;14 Suppl 1:s33-8. doi: 10.1191/0961203305lu2115oa.
8
Low risk of renal flares and negative outcomes in women with lupus nephritis conceiving after switching from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine.狼疮肾炎女性患者从吗替麦考酚酯转换为硫唑嘌呤后妊娠,其发生肾危象和不良结局的风险较低。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Jun;52(6):1070-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes425. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
9
Azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil for long-term immunosuppression in lupus nephritis: results from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial.来氟米特与吗替麦考酚酯治疗狼疮性肾炎的长期免疫抑制作用:来自 MAINTAIN 肾炎试验的结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Dec;69(12):2083-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.131995. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
10
Repeat kidney biopsies fail to detect differences between azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis: data from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial.重复肾活检未能检测到狼疮肾炎维持治疗中硫唑嘌呤和霉酚酸酯之间的差异:来自 MAINTAIN 肾炎试验的数据。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 May;27(5):1924-30. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr553. Epub 2011 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
MOONLIGHT study: the design of a comparative study of the effectiveness of belimumab in patients with a history of lupus nephritis from the post-Marketed effectiveness of belimumab cOhOrt and JapaN Lupus NatIonwide reGistry (LUNA) coHorT.月光研究:一项贝丽珠单抗对比治疗狼疮肾炎患者有效性的研究设计,该研究基于贝丽珠单抗上市后疗效的 Cohort 研究和日本狼疮全国注册登记研究(LUNA)。
Lupus Sci Med. 2022 Sep;9(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000746.
2
Multicentric study comparing cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine in the maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis: 8 years follow up.比较环孢素、霉酚酸酯和硫唑嘌呤在狼疮性肾炎维持治疗中的多中心研究:8年随访
J Nephrol. 2021 Apr;34(2):389-398. doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00753-w. Epub 2020 May 27.
3
Current status of lupus nephritis.狼疮性肾炎的现状
Indian J Med Res. 2017 Feb;145(2):167-178. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_163_16.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis : A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.他克莫司、霉酚酸酯、硫唑嘌呤和环磷酰胺作为狼疮性肾炎维持治疗的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Z Rheumatol. 2017 Dec;76(10):904-912. doi: 10.1007/s00393-016-0186-z.
5
Efficacy of long-term maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis.霉酚酸酯长期维持治疗狼疮性肾炎的疗效
Springerplus. 2014 Oct 28;3:638. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-638. eCollection 2014.
6
Clearing the complexity: immune complexes and their treatment in lupus nephritis.理清复杂性:免疫复合物及其在狼疮性肾炎中的治疗
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:17-28. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S10233. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
7
Mycophenolate mofetil as maintenance therapy for proliferative lupus nephritis: a long-term observational prospective study.霉酚酸酯作为增生性狼疮肾炎的维持治疗:一项长期观察性前瞻性研究。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(6):R208. doi: 10.1186/ar3184. Epub 2010 Nov 9.