Butera Gianfranco, Romagnoli Enrico, Carminati Mario, Chessa Massimo, Piazza Luciane, Negura Diana, Giamberti Alessandro, Abella Raul, Pomè Giuseppe, Condoluci Claudia, Frigiola Alessandro
Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico San Donato IRCCS, San Donato, Milanese (MI), Italy.
Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):706-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is a valid alternative to surgical approach. Current device has significantly improved the success rate also in complex cases. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of age, defect size, and morphologic features on successfully percutaneous ASD closure.
Between January 2000 and September 2004, 1,013 consecutive patients underwent closure of an isolated type II ASD at our institution. The following outcomes have been evaluated: (1) role of percutaneous ASD closure as alternative to surgical repair, in current daily practice; (2) impact of age on the selected closure approach; (3) analysis of morphologic variety of ASD and its effect on the closure technique; (4) possible role of specific device selection according to ASD morphology to improve procedural success.
During the study period, up to 80% of secundum ASDs were suitable for percutaneous closure with the currently available devices. Need for surgical ASD closure was more common in pediatric patients, likely reflecting the more frequent diagnosis of larger and complex defects at a young age. Accurate ADS morphology assessment and appropriate device selection are key elements to obtain procedural success. In particular, among all the ASD characteristics, the rim absence is the main limiting factor to a successful percutaneous ASD closure. A trend of reduction in peri-procedural adverse events was observed during the study period, with complications needing immediate cardiac surgery occurred only in 1% of cases.
Percutaneous ASD closure is feasible and associated with low complication rate. A thorough analysis of morphologic aspects is mandatory in order to select the appropriate device and the optimal approach. Surgical closure remains the treatment of choice in selected patients.
经皮房间隔缺损(ASD)封堵术是手术治疗的一种有效替代方法。目前的封堵装置在复杂病例中也显著提高了成功率。本研究的目的是评估年龄、缺损大小和形态学特征对经皮ASD封堵术成功的影响。
2000年1月至2004年9月期间,我院连续1013例患者接受了孤立性II型ASD封堵术。评估了以下结果:(1)在当前日常实践中,经皮ASD封堵术作为手术修复替代方法的作用;(2)年龄对所选封堵方法的影响;(3)ASD形态学多样性分析及其对封堵技术的影响;(4)根据ASD形态选择特定装置以提高手术成功率的可能作用。
在研究期间,高达80%的继发孔型ASD适合使用现有装置进行经皮封堵。小儿患者更常需要进行手术ASD封堵,这可能反映出在年轻时更频繁地诊断出较大和复杂的缺损。准确评估ASD形态和适当选择装置是获得手术成功的关键因素。特别是,在所有ASD特征中,边缘缺失是经皮ASD封堵术成功的主要限制因素。在研究期间观察到围手术期不良事件有减少趋势,仅1%的病例发生需要立即进行心脏手术的并发症。
经皮ASD封堵术是可行的,且并发症发生率低。必须对形态学方面进行全面分析,以选择合适的装置和最佳方法。对于选定的患者,手术封堵仍是首选治疗方法。