• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网上与手术相关的信息质量如何?从对10种常见手术的标准化评估中获得的经验教训。

What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations.

作者信息

Yermilov Irina, Chow Warren, Devgan Lara, Makary Martin A, Ko Clifford Y

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Greater West Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Oct;207(4):580-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.034. Epub 2008 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.034
PMID:18926463
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there is high-quality information on the Internet, it is difficult for patients to identify high-quality Web sites from those with inaccurate or misleading information. Our goal was to determine specific characteristics of Web search results that yield high-quality information and can be discerned easily by patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A validated rating system was used to evaluate surgical Web sites for appropriateness and adequacy. Web sites were identified using three search term types (technical, descriptive, and layperson) for 10 common surgical procedures. The top three sponsored (paid) and unsponsored (unpaid) Web site matches were identified. The search and analysis were repeated 1 month later.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five Web sites were retrieved: 90 unsponsored and 55 sponsored. Unsponsored sites had higher mean composite scores than sponsored Web sites (50.6% versus 25%, p < 0.0001). Searches using layperson terms had lower mean composite scores compared with those using technical terms (36.9% versus 47.5%, p < 0.02). Professional Web sites had the highest mean composite scores (66.3%); legal Web sites had the lowest (6.3%). On regression analysis, unsponsored Web sites were associated with higher composite scores (p < 0.0001); number 1 match results (p < 0.02) and using layperson search terms (p < 0.052) were associated with lower mean composite scores. Repeat search results demonstrated no significant differences, except number 3 match results were no longer significant.

CONCLUSIONS

To optimize patients' Web searches, surgeons should recommend unsponsored sites; suggest professional society sites, if available; and provide technical search terms. But information on some topics, such as risks of not undergoing surgery, remains poor and requires discussion between the surgeon and patient.

摘要

背景

尽管互联网上有高质量的信息,但患者很难从那些提供不准确或误导性信息的网站中识别出高质量的网站。我们的目标是确定网络搜索结果的具体特征,这些特征能够产生高质量的信息并且患者能够轻松辨别。

研究设计

使用一个经过验证的评分系统来评估外科手术相关网站的适宜性和充分性。通过三种搜索词类型(专业术语、描述性术语和外行术语)来识别10种常见外科手术的网站。确定排名前三的付费和免费网站匹配结果。1个月后重复进行搜索和分析。

结果

共检索到145个网站:90个免费网站和55个付费网站。免费网站的平均综合得分高于付费网站(50.6%对25%,p<0.0001)。与使用专业术语的搜索相比,使用外行术语的搜索平均综合得分更低(36.9%对47.5%,p<0.02)。专业网站的平均综合得分最高(66.3%);法律网站的得分最低(6.3%)。回归分析显示,免费网站与更高的综合得分相关(p<0.0001);排名第一的匹配结果(p<0.02)和使用外行搜索词(p<0.052)与更低的平均综合得分相关。重复搜索结果显示无显著差异,除了排名第三的匹配结果不再显著。

结论

为了优化患者的网络搜索,外科医生应推荐免费网站;如果有专业学会网站,建议患者访问;并提供专业搜索词。但是关于某些主题的信息,如不进行手术的风险,仍然很少,需要外科医生和患者之间进行讨论。

相似文献

1
What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations.互联网上与手术相关的信息质量如何?从对10种常见手术的标准化评估中获得的经验教训。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Oct;207(4):580-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.034. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
2
How to measure the quality of surgery-related web sites.
Am Surg. 2008 Oct;74(10):997-1000.
3
Improving Web searches: case study of quit-smoking Web sites for teenagers.改善网络搜索:青少年戒烟网站的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Nov 14;5(4):e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.4.e28.
4
Publicly available hospital comparison web sites: determination of useful, valid, and appropriate information for comparing surgical quality.公开可用的医院比较网站:确定用于比较手术质量的有用、有效且合适的信息。
Arch Surg. 2007 Sep;142(9):863-8; discussion 868-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.9.863.
5
Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet.互联网上有关颈椎间盘突出症的信息质量。
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):350-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.009.
6
Quality analysis of patient information about knee arthroscopy on the World Wide Web.万维网上膝关节镜检查患者信息的质量分析
Arthroscopy. 2007 May;23(5):509-513.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.007.
7
Systematic internet-based review of complementary and alternative medicine for glaucoma.基于互联网对青光眼补充和替代医学的系统评价。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Mar;115(3):435-439.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.07.001. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
8
The world wide web and robotic heart surgery.万维网与机器人心脏手术。
Heart Surg Forum. 2003;6(6):E111-9.
9
Evaluation of Norwegian cancer hospitals web sites and explorative survey among cancer patients on their use of the internet.挪威癌症医院网站评估及针对癌症患者互联网使用情况的探索性调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2001 Oct-Dec;3(4):E30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.4.e30.
10
Back pain online: a cross-sectional survey of the quality of web-based information on low back pain.在线背痛:关于腰痛的网络信息质量的横断面调查
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Feb 15;28(4):395-401. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048497.38319.D3.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of informatics in promoting patient-centered care.信息学在促进以患者为中心的护理中的作用。
Cancer J. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):211-8. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318225ff89.