Roebroeks Wil
Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9515, 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Hum Evol. 2008 Nov;55(5):918-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition is a key period of change in the prehistory of the Old World and one of the most studied issues in paleoanthropology, as the nature of the transition(s) is still, after at least a century of archaeological research, largely unknown. Many of the issues at stake in the transition relate to the problem of building a reliable chronology for this period, which is at the limits of the radiocarbon method. The papers in this volume show that much progress has been made in our chronological knowledge of significant aspects of the transition, such as the age of the most recent Neandertal fossils and the earliest modern human remains in Europe, and the inferred overlap between the Châtelperronian and the Aurignacian. At the same time, the volume also shows where the chronological database for the period 40 to 30 ka 14C BP is flawed and that significant contextual and methodological problems have been underestimated in a number of studies of the biological and cultural changes during this crucial period. Chronology is employed by paleoanthropologists to relate the record of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition to major biological and cultural developments. This paper takes a broader paleoanthropological perspective and attempts to evaluate and, to some degree, synthesize the main results of these proceedings, while also presenting a brief discussion of the Middle and Upper Paleolithic archaeological and fossil records, and possible explanations for the differences between the two, focusing on the role of differences in the ecology of Neandertals and early European modern humans.
旧石器时代中期向晚期的过渡是旧大陆史前史中一个关键的变革时期,也是古人类学中研究最多的问题之一,因为经过至少一个世纪的考古研究,这种过渡的本质在很大程度上仍然未知。过渡中许多利害攸关的问题都与为这一时期建立可靠年表的问题有关,而这已处于放射性碳测年法的极限。本卷中的论文表明,在我们对过渡重要方面的年代学认识上已经取得了很大进展,比如欧洲最近的尼安德特人化石和最早的现代人类遗骸的年代,以及夏特尔佩罗文化与奥瑞纳文化之间推断的重叠期。与此同时,本卷也指出了40至30 ka 14C BP这一时期年代学数据库的缺陷,并且在一些关于这一关键时期生物和文化变化的研究中,重大的背景和方法问题被低估了。古人类学家利用年代学将旧石器时代中期向晚期的过渡记录与主要的生物和文化发展联系起来。本文从更广泛的古人类学视角出发,试图评估并在一定程度上综合这些论文的主要成果,同时简要讨论旧石器时代中期和晚期的考古及化石记录,以及两者差异的可能解释,重点关注尼安德特人和早期欧洲现代人生态差异所起的作用。