Hopwood P, Howell A, Maguire P
Cancer Research Campaign Psychological Medicine Group, Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Withington, Manchester, UK.
Br J Cancer. 1991 Aug;64(2):353-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.305.
Eighty-one patients with advanced breast cancer completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) to determine how well these questionnaires identified patients suffering from an anxiety state or depressive illness, compared with an independent interview by a psychiatrist who used the Clinical Interview Schedule. A threshold score was defined for each questionnaire which gave the optimal sensitivity and specificity. Seventy-five per cent of patients were correctly identified as suffering from an affective disorder by both the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist and by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Twenty-one per cent of 'normal' patients were misclassified by the Rotterdam Checklist and 26% by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. When the HADs anxiety and depression subscales were analysed separately, the performance of the anxiety items was superior to that of the depression items. Both questionnaires were found to have good predictive value and could be used in patients with advanced cancer to help screen out those with an affective disorder.
81例晚期乳腺癌患者完成了医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和鹿特丹症状清单(RSCL),以确定与使用临床访谈量表的精神科医生进行的独立访谈相比,这些问卷在识别焦虑状态或抑郁疾病患者方面的效果如何。为每份问卷定义了一个阈值分数,该分数给出了最佳的敏感性和特异性。75%的患者通过鹿特丹症状清单和医院焦虑抑郁量表均被正确识别为患有情感障碍。21%的“正常”患者被鹿特丹清单误分类,26%被医院焦虑抑郁量表误分类。当分别分析HADS焦虑和抑郁子量表时,焦虑项目的表现优于抑郁项目。发现两份问卷都具有良好的预测价值,可用于晚期癌症患者,以帮助筛查出患有情感障碍的患者。