Vuillerme Nicolas, Bertrand Romain, Pinsault Nicolas
Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Oct;89(10):2034-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.03.017.
To assess the effects of the scaled display of visual foot center of pressure (COP) feedback on upright postural control under different somatosensory conditions at the foot and the ankle.
Before and after intervention trials.
University medical bioengineering laboratory.
Young healthy adults (N=8; mean age, 23+/-2.5 y; mean body weight, 76.8+/-11.2 kg; mean height, 179.8+/-6.8 cm).
Participants were asked to stand upright, as immobile as possible, in 3 visual conditions: a stationary cross feedback (SC-FB) condition and 2 different foot COP feedback (COP-FB) conditions involving increasing scale displays of 2:1 (COP-FB2) and of 10:1 (COP-FB10). These latter conditions correspond to the ratio between the COP displacement on the screen and the actual COP displacement measured by the force platform. This postural task was executed on 2 (firm, foam) support surface conditions. In the foam condition, a 2-cm thick foam support surface was placed under the participants' feet to alter the quality and/or quantity of somatosensory information at the foot and the ankle.
COP displacements were recorded using a force platform.
In the firm support surface condition, no significant difference was observed between the COP-FB2 and the SC-FB conditions, whereas the COP-FB10 condition yielded decreased COP displacements relative to the SC-FB condition. In the foam support surface condition, both the COP-FB2 and the COP-FB10 conditions yielded decreased COP displacements relative to the SC-FB condition, with a greater stabilizing effect in the COP-FB10 than COP-FB2 condition.
The postural effects of the scale display of visual COP feedback differed depending on the somatosensory conditions at the foot and the ankle. These findings suggest that increased reliance on augmented sensory information for controlling upright posture in conditions of altered somatosensory input from the foot and ankle could have implications in clinical and rehabilitative areas.
评估视觉足底压力中心(COP)反馈的缩放显示对不同足部和踝关节本体感觉条件下直立姿势控制的影响。
干预前后试验。
大学医学生物工程实验室。
年轻健康成年人(N = 8;平均年龄,23±2.5岁;平均体重,76.8±11.2千克;平均身高,179.8±6.8厘米)。
要求参与者在3种视觉条件下尽可能静止地直立:静态十字反馈(SC-FB)条件和2种不同的足部COP反馈(COP-FB)条件,包括2:1(COP-FB2)和10:1(COP-FB10)的递增缩放显示。后两种条件对应于屏幕上COP位移与力平台测量的实际COP位移之间的比率。该姿势任务在2种(坚硬、泡沫)支撑表面条件下执行。在泡沫条件下,在参与者脚下放置一个2厘米厚的泡沫支撑表面,以改变足部和踝关节本体感觉信息的质量和/或数量。
使用力平台记录COP位移。
在坚硬支撑表面条件下,COP-FB2和SC-FB条件之间未观察到显著差异,而COP-FB10条件相对于SC-FB条件产生了降低的COP位移。在泡沫支撑表面条件下,COP-FB2和COP-FB10条件相对于SC-FB条件均产生了降低的COP位移,COP-FB10的稳定效果大于COP-FB2条件。
视觉COP反馈缩放显示的姿势效应因足部和踝关节的本体感觉条件而异。这些发现表明,在足部和踝关节本体感觉输入改变的情况下,增加对增强感觉信息的依赖以控制直立姿势可能在临床和康复领域具有重要意义。