Kiekens Rosemie M A, Kuijpers-Jagtman Anne Marie, van 't Hof Martin A, van 't Hof Bep E, Maltha Jaap C
Department of Orthodontics and Oral Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):480-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.041.
In orthodontics, facial esthetics is assumed to be related to golden proportions apparent in the ideal human face. The aim of the study was to analyze the putative relationship between facial esthetics and golden proportions in white adolescents.
Seventy-six adult laypeople evaluated sets of photographs of 64 adolescents on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100. The facial esthetic value of each subject was calculated as a mean VAS score. Three observers recorded the position of 13 facial landmarks included in 19 putative golden proportions, based on the golden proportions as defined by Ricketts. The proportions and each proportion's deviation from the golden target (1.618) were calculated. This deviation was then related to the VAS scores.
Only 4 of the 19 proportions had a significant negative correlation with the VAS scores, indicating that beautiful faces showed less deviation from the golden standard than less beautiful faces. Together, these variables explained only 16% of the variance.
Few golden proportions have a significant relationship with facial esthetics in adolescents. The explained variance of these variables is too small to be of clinical importance.
在正畸学中，面部美学被认为与理想人类面部中明显的黄金比例有关。本研究的目的是分析白人青少年面部美学与黄金比例之间的假定关系。
76名成年外行人在0至100的视觉模拟量表（VAS）上对64名青少年的照片集进行评估。每个受试者的面部美学价值以VAS评分的平均值计算。三名观察者根据里氏定义的黄金比例记录了19个假定黄金比例中包含的13个面部标志点的位置。计算了这些比例以及每个比例与黄金目标值（1.618）的偏差。然后将此偏差与VAS评分相关联。
19个比例中只有4个与VAS评分呈显著负相关，表明美丽的面部与黄金标准的偏差小于不太美丽的面部。这些变量共同仅解释了16%的方差。
在青少年中，很少有黄金比例与面部美学有显著关系。这些变量所解释的方差太小，以至于没有临床意义。
