• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年对微笑真实性的认知。

Children's and adolescents' perception of the authenticity of smiles.

作者信息

Thibault Pascal, Gosselin Pierre, Brunel Marie-Lise, Hess Ursula

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal, Station Centre-ville, Que., Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Mar;102(3):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.005
PMID:18930472
Abstract

Recently, Thibault and colleagues described the Duchenne marker as a cultural dialect for the perception of smile authenticity. The current study had the goal to follow up on this finding and to investigate the cues that French Canadian children use to evaluate the authenticity of smiles from members of three ethnic groups. The authenticity of six smiles differing in intensity and presence of orbicularis oculi (Duchenne marker) was rated by 1206 children from 4 to 17 years of age. No differences were found as a function of encoder group. All children perceived medium Duchenne smiles as more authentic than equally intense medium non-Duchenne smiles. Furthermore, results suggest a decrease in the reliance on intensity across the age span. Younger children use the intensity marker along the whole continuum to infer authenticity. In contrast, older children (14- to 17-year-olds) rated all smiles that did not contain the Duchenne marker as roughly equally low in authenticity.

摘要

最近,蒂博ault及其同事将杜兴标志描述为一种用于感知微笑真实性的文化方言。本研究旨在跟进这一发现,并调查法裔加拿大儿童用于评估来自三个种族群体成员微笑真实性的线索。1206名4至17岁的儿童对六种强度不同且存在眼轮匝肌(杜兴标志)的微笑的真实性进行了评分。未发现编码组之间存在差异。所有儿童都认为中等强度的杜兴微笑比强度相同的中等强度非杜兴微笑更真实。此外,结果表明随着年龄增长,对强度的依赖程度有所下降。年幼的儿童在整个连续统一体上使用强度标志来推断真实性。相比之下,年龄较大的儿童(14至17岁)将所有不包含杜兴标志的微笑的真实性评为大致同样低。

相似文献

1
Children's and adolescents' perception of the authenticity of smiles.儿童和青少年对微笑真实性的认知。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Mar;102(3):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
2
Does oral health affect self perceptions, parental ratings and video-based assessments of children's smiles?口腔健康会影响儿童对自身笑容的认知、父母的评价以及基于视频的评估吗?
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;35(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00327.x.
3
Differences between children and adults in the recognition of enjoyment smiles.儿童与成人在识别享受性微笑方面的差异。
Dev Psychol. 2007 May;43(3):796-803. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.796.
4
Can Duchenne smiles be feigned? New evidence on felt and false smiles.真笑可以伪装吗?关于真实和虚假微笑的新证据。
Emotion. 2009 Dec;9(6):807-20. doi: 10.1037/a0017844.
5
Perceptions of Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles: A meta-analysis.对杜兴式微笑和非杜兴式微笑的认知:一项元分析。
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(3):501-15. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1018817. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
6
The perception and mimicry of facial movements predict judgments of smile authenticity.对面部动作的感知和模仿能预测对微笑真实性的判断。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 11;9(6):e99194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099194. eCollection 2014.
7
Perception of genuine and masking smiles in children and adults: sensitivity to traces of anger.
J Genet Psychol. 2002 Mar;163(1):58-71. doi: 10.1080/00221320209597968.
8
Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics.微笑美学的主观与客观评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4 Suppl):S72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.040.
9
Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics.在微笑美学评估中Q分类法评估与视觉模拟评分法的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4 Suppl):S61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.019.
10
Influence of dental esthetics on social perceptions of adolescents judged by peers.青少年的牙齿美观对同伴判断其社会认知的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3):389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological Variations to Explore Conflicting Results in the Existing Literature of Masking Smile Judgment.探索微笑掩饰判断现有文献中相互矛盾结果的方法学变异
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;14(10):944. doi: 10.3390/bs14100944.
2
The role of emotion-related individual differences in enjoyment and masking smile judgment.情绪相关个体差异在享受和掩饰微笑判断中的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Apr 25;11(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01173-8.
3
Human perception and biosignal-based identification of posed and spontaneous smiles.基于人类感知和生物信号的人为和自然微笑识别。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226328. eCollection 2019.
4
Children can discriminate the authenticity of happy but not sad or fearful facial expressions, and use an immature intensity-only strategy.儿童能够辨别快乐的面部表情的真实性,但不能辨别悲伤或恐惧的面部表情,并且使用一种不成熟的仅基于强度的策略。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 5;6:462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00462. eCollection 2015.
5
The perception and mimicry of facial movements predict judgments of smile authenticity.对面部动作的感知和模仿能预测对微笑真实性的判断。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 11;9(6):e99194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099194. eCollection 2014.
6
Analysis of eye movements in the judgment of enjoyment and non-enjoyment smiles.分析判断愉悦和非愉悦微笑时的眼球运动。
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 24;4:659. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00659. eCollection 2013.
7
A psycho-ethological approach to social signal processing.一种用于社会信号处理的心理行为学方法。
Cogn Process. 2012 Oct;13 Suppl 2:397-414. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0435-2. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
8
Individual differences in the recognition of enjoyment smiles: no role for perceptual-attentional factors and autistic-like traits.个体对愉悦微笑识别的差异:知觉注意因素和类似自闭症特质不起作用。
Front Psychol. 2011 Jul 7;2:143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00143. eCollection 2011.