Irwin Jay, Lagory Mark, Ritchey Ferris, Fitzpatrick Kevin
Department of Sociology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):1935-43. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
This paper explores the role of social capital in mediating the effects of stressors on depression among a disadvantaged population. Utilizing a survey of 155 homeless people in a mid-sized southern U.S. city, the authors address the relevance of social capital for quality of life. The paper provides a critical test of whether social support and other forms of social capital matter when monetary and human capital is extremely limited. Under these resource-restricted circumstances does social capital add to our understanding of the distress process or does it merely restate the well established relationship between social support and quality of life outcomes? Various forms of social capital are measured: religious social capital, group participation, social trust, and bridging social capital along with a commonly used measure of social support -- perceived strong tie support. Findings suggest that social capital matters for even the most resource poor populations. In addition, social capital variables add significantly to the variance explained in depressive symptomatology over and above that traditionally explained by perceived social support.
本文探讨了社会资本在美国南部一个中等规模城市中,对弱势群体压力源与抑郁之间关系的调节作用。作者通过对155名无家可归者进行调查,研究社会资本对生活质量的影响。本文对货币资本和人力资本极其有限时,社会支持及其他形式的社会资本是否重要进行了关键检验。在这些资源受限的情况下,社会资本是增进了我们对痛苦过程的理解,还是仅仅重申了社会支持与生活质量结果之间已确立的关系?文中衡量了多种形式的社会资本:宗教社会资本、群体参与、社会信任、桥梁型社会资本,以及常用的社会支持衡量指标——感知到的强关系支持。研究结果表明,即使是资源最匮乏的人群,社会资本也很重要。此外,社会资本变量对抑郁症状的方差解释有显著贡献,超出了传统上由感知到的社会支持所解释的部分。