Husak R L, Sebranek J G, Bregendahl K
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.
Poult Sci. 2008 Nov;87(11):2367-76. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00294.
The objective of this survey was to investigate qualitative and quantitative properties of meat from organic, free-range, and conventional broilers as currently provided to consumers. Fifteen broilers from 4 suppliers of each type were evaluated for raw meat yield, cooked meat yield, proximate composition, pH, color, lipid oxidation, fatty acid composition, and sensory attributes. Organic broilers yielded more dark (thigh) meat (P < 0.05) than free-range or conventional, when compared on a raw-meat basis, but conventional and free-range broilers yielded more (P < 0.05) cooked light (breast) meat than organic. Protein content of organic breast and thigh meat was greater (P < 0.05) than conventional in the raw and the cooked meat comparisons. The pH of breast meat from organic broilers was higher (P < 0.05) than free-range or conventional. Organic breast and thigh meat was less yellow (P < 0.05) than free-range or conventional. Fatty acid analysis showed that organic breasts and thighs were lower (P < 0.05) in saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids and higher (P < 0.05) in polyunsaturated fatty acids than free-range and conventional broilers. Shear force measurements were less (P < 0.05) for both breast and thigh meat from conventional broilers relative to free-range and organic broilers. Sensory panel results indicated that thighs from conventional broilers were more tender (P < 0.05) and less chewy (P < 0.05) than thighs from free-range and organic broilers, whereas other sensory properties did not differ. At the time of the study, March through May of 2006, the average retail prices for US broilers were USD 3.19, USD 2.78, and USD 1.29 per pound (USD 7.03, USD 6.13, and USD 2.84/kg) for organic, free-range, and conventional, respectively. Whereas a difference in the fatty acid composition was the largest difference observed between retail broilers in this survey, it is important to note that diets and production environments within the study were not controlled. It is apparent that the market prices for broilers at the time of this study are not fully reflected in the quantitative and qualitative measurements included in this study. It appears that consumers may be placing significant value on more intangible attributes associated with broilers marketed as organic and free-range chicken than on those attributes measured in this study.
本次调查的目的是研究目前供应给消费者的有机、散养和传统肉鸡的肉质的定性和定量特性。对来自每种类型的4个供应商的15只肉鸡进行了生肉产量、熟肉产量、近似成分、pH值、颜色、脂质氧化、脂肪酸组成和感官属性的评估。以生肉为基础进行比较时,有机肉鸡的深色(大腿)肉产量比散养或传统肉鸡更多(P < 0.05),但传统和散养肉鸡的熟浅色(胸脯)肉产量比有机肉鸡更多(P < 0.05)。在生肉和熟肉比较中,有机胸脯肉和大腿肉的蛋白质含量比传统肉鸡更高(P < 0.05)。有机肉鸡胸脯肉的pH值比散养或传统肉鸡更高(P < 0.05)。有机胸脯肉和大腿肉的黄色比散养或传统肉鸡更浅(P < 0.05)。脂肪酸分析表明,与散养和传统肉鸡相比,有机胸脯肉和大腿肉的饱和脂肪酸和单不饱和脂肪酸含量更低(P < 0.05),多不饱和脂肪酸含量更高(P < 0.05)。相对于散养和有机肉鸡,传统肉鸡胸脯肉和大腿肉的剪切力测量值更小(P < 0.05)。感官评定结果表明,传统肉鸡的大腿肉比散养和有机肉鸡的大腿肉更嫩(P < 0.05)且更不易咀嚼(P < 0.05),而其他感官特性没有差异。在2006年3月至5月进行这项研究时,美国有机、散养和传统肉鸡的平均零售价格分别为每磅3.19美元、2.78美元和1.29美元(分别为每千克7.03美元、6.13美元和2.84美元)。尽管在本次调查中观察到零售肉鸡之间最大的差异在于脂肪酸组成,但需要注意的是,该研究中的日粮和生产环境并未得到控制。显然,在本研究进行时,肉鸡的市场价格并未完全反映在本研究中所包含的定量和定性测量中。消费者似乎可能更看重与作为有机和散养鸡肉销售的肉鸡相关的更多无形属性,而不是本研究中所测量的那些属性。