Suppr超能文献

缓解抑郁症的序贯治疗方案(STAR*D)。第2部分:研究结果。

Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D). Part 2: Study outcomes.

作者信息

Howland Robert H

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Western Pychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2008 Oct;46(10):21-4. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20081001-05.

Abstract

This article reviews the main outcome findings from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study. The study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a range of antidepressant therapies through four sequential levels of treatment with the goal of achieving remission. Remission rates based on the primary outcome measure (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) were 28% (Level 1 citalopram), 17% to 30% (Level 2 treatments), 12% to 25% (Level 3 treatments), and 7% to 14% (Level 4 treatments). For patients not responding adequately to an initial trial of citalopram, subsequent treatment strategies may be effective. When more treatment steps are required, however, lower acute remission rates, greater degrees of treatment intolerance, and higher relapse rates during follow up are seen. There were few differences among treatments within each level related to efficacy or tolerability, although patients had clear preferences for or against certain treatments.

摘要

本文回顾了缓解抑郁症的序贯治疗方案(STAR*D)研究的主要结果。该研究通过四个连续治疗阶段比较了一系列抗抑郁疗法的疗效和耐受性,目标是实现症状缓解。基于主要结局指标(汉密尔顿抑郁量表)的缓解率在第1阶段(西酞普兰)为28%,第2阶段治疗为17%至30%,第3阶段治疗为12%至25%,第4阶段治疗为7%至14%。对于对西酞普兰初始试验反应不充分的患者,后续治疗策略可能有效。然而,当需要更多治疗步骤时,会出现较低的急性缓解率、更高的治疗不耐受程度以及随访期间更高的复发率。尽管患者对某些治疗有明确的偏好或反感,但每个治疗阶段内各治疗方法在疗效或耐受性方面差异不大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验