Davoudi Seyyed Masoud, Behnia Fereydoun, Gorouhi Farzam, Keshavarz Saeed, Nassiri Kashani Mansour, Rashighi Firoozabadi Mehdi, Firooz Alireza
Department of Dermatology, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arch Dermatol. 2008 Oct;144(10):1323-7. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.10.1323.
To compare the long-term effectiveness and safety of long-pulsed Nd:YAG and alexandrite lasers, individually and in combination, in long-term leg hair reduction.
Randomized, single-center, within-participant, investigator-blinded, active-controlled clinical trial.
Private skin laser center.
Twenty individuals aged 16 to 50 years with skin phototypes III and IV.
The medial and lateral sides of each participant's legs were randomly assigned to receive 1 of the following laser treatments: (1) long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser (12-mm spot size); (2) long-pulsed 755-nm alexandrite laser (12-mm spot size); (3) long-pulsed 755-nm alexandrite laser (18-mm spot size); and (4) a combination of long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser and long-pulsed 755-nm alexandrite laser (treatments 1 and 2). Identified areas were treated for a total of 4 sessions at 8-week intervals.
Hair reduction from baseline based on hair counting with digital photography by 2 blinded assessors, 8 and 18 months after the last treatment session.
Fifteen participants completed the trial. The mean (SD) hair reduction 18 months after the last treatment, as measured by the assessors from digital photographs, were 75.9% (19.0%) for the 12-mm spot size alexandrite laser, 84.3% (12.4%) for the 18-mm spot size alexandrite laser, 73.6% (11.4%) for the Nd:YAG laser, and 77.8% (15.9%) for the combination therapy (analysis of variance, P > .05). The incidence of adverse effects (hyperpigmentation) and pain severity were significantly greater in areas that received combination therapy (P = .001).
After 18 months of follow-up, alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers were efficacious for leg hair removal. Combination therapy did not have any additional benefit and caused more adverse effects.
比较长脉冲Nd:YAG激光和翠绿宝石激光单独及联合应用于长期腿部脱毛的长期有效性和安全性。
随机、单中心、受试者自身对照、研究者设盲、活性对照临床试验。
私立皮肤激光中心。
20名年龄在16至50岁之间、皮肤光型为III型和IV型的个体。
将每位参与者腿部的内侧和外侧随机分配接受以下激光治疗中的一种:(1)长脉冲1064纳米Nd:YAG激光(光斑大小12毫米);(2)长脉冲755纳米翠绿宝石激光(光斑大小12毫米);(3)长脉冲755纳米翠绿宝石激光(光斑大小18毫米);以及(4)长脉冲1064纳米Nd:YAG激光和长脉冲755纳米翠绿宝石激光联合治疗(治疗1和治疗2)。对确定的区域共进行4次治疗,间隔8周。
由2名设盲评估者通过数码摄影计数毛发,在最后一次治疗后8个月和18个月时,与基线相比的毛发减少情况。
15名参与者完成了试验。评估者通过数码照片测量,最后一次治疗后18个月时,光斑大小12毫米的翠绿宝石激光毛发减少率平均(标准差)为75.9%(19.0%),光斑大小18毫米的翠绿宝石激光为84.3%(12.4%),Nd:YAG激光为73.6%(11.4%),联合治疗为77.8%(15.9%)(方差分析,P>.05)。联合治疗区域的不良反应(色素沉着)发生率和疼痛严重程度显著更高(P = .001)。
经过18个月的随访,翠绿宝石激光和Nd:YAG激光对腿部脱毛有效。联合治疗没有额外益处,且会导致更多不良反应。