Suppr超能文献

前列腺穿刺活检中具有三级Gleason 5级模式的前列腺癌:临床病理特征及疾病进展

Prostate cancer with tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in prostate needle biopsy: clinicopathologic findings and disease progression.

作者信息

Trpkov Kiril, Zhang Jianguo, Chan Melissa, Eigl Bernhard J C, Yilmaz Asli

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Feb;33(2):233-40. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31817fb3bd.

Abstract

Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern/grade 5 on prostatectomy has been studied, but its significance on biopsy remains uncertain. Recent International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference recommended that biopsy Gleason score is generated by adding tertiary grade 5 to the primary grade. We examined the preoperative clinical and biopsy findings in 53 patients with biopsy tertiary pattern 5 and 119 patients with primary/secondary biopsy pattern 5. Prostatectomy findings and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure rates were compared in surgically treated patients. Cause-specific and all-cause mortality were compared in patients treated nonsurgically. At presentation, age, gland volume, PSA, and biopsy cancer volume were similar in patients with tertiary and primary/secondary grade 5. Only 20 patients underwent prostatectomy and 152 were treated nonsurgically. Regardless of the pattern, patients treated by prostatectomy were younger (P=0.003), had lower PSA (P=0.001), and less cancer on biopsy (P=0.0001). Prostatectomy findings and PSA failures were not significantly different in patients with tertiary grade 5 versus primary/secondary pattern 5. In nonsurgically treated patients, patients with primary pattern 5 compared with those with tertiary pattern 5 had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-4.90, P=0.026] and cause-specific mortality (adjusted HR: 7.52, 95% CI: 2.84-19.87, P<0.001). In contrast, patients with secondary pattern 5 had a comparable all-cause mortality risk to patients with tertiary pattern 5 (adjusted HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.47-2.32, P=0.92), but had a marginally higher risk of cause-specific mortality than patients with tertiary pattern 5 (adjusted HR: 2.13, 95% CI: 0.75-6.10, P=0.16).

摘要

前列腺切除术中 Gleason 分级 5 级的意义已得到研究,但其在活检中的意义仍不明确。最近的国际泌尿病理学会共识会议建议,活检 Gleason 评分是通过将三级 5 级加到一级评分上得出的。我们检查了 53 例活检三级模式为 5 级的患者和 119 例一级/二级活检模式为 5 级的患者的术前临床和活检结果。对接受手术治疗的患者比较了前列腺切除结果和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)失败率。对非手术治疗的患者比较了特定病因和全因死亡率。就诊时,三级和一级/二级 5 级患者的年龄、腺体体积、PSA 和活检癌体积相似。仅 20 例患者接受了前列腺切除术,152 例接受了非手术治疗。无论模式如何,接受前列腺切除术的患者更年轻(P = 0.003),PSA 更低(P = 0.001),活检时癌症更少(P = 0.0001)。三级 5 级患者与一级/二级模式 5 级患者的前列腺切除结果和 PSA 失败情况无显著差异。在非手术治疗的患者中,一级模式 5 级患者与三级模式 5 级患者相比,全因死亡率风险显著更高[调整后风险比(HR):2.33,95%置信区间(CI):1.10 - 4.90,P = 0.026],特定病因死亡率风险也更高(调整后 HR:7.52,95%CI:2.84 - 19.87,P < 0.001)。相比之下,二级模式 5 级患者与三级模式 5 级患者的全因死亡率风险相当(调整后 HR:1.04,95%CI:0.47 - 2.32,P = 0.92),但特定病因死亡率风险略高于三级模式 5 级患者(调整后 HR:2.13,95%CI:0.75 - 6.10,P = 0.16)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验