• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术后有和无筛状结构的 Grade Group 1 和 Grade Group 2 前列腺癌的临床结局比较。

Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Histopathology. 2020 Apr;76(5):755-762. doi: 10.1111/his.14064.

DOI:10.1111/his.14064
PMID:31944367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7216977/
Abstract

AIMS

Invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma are associated with aggressive disease in Grade Group 2 (GG2) prostate cancer patients. However, the characteristics and clinical outcome of patients with GG2 prostate cancer without cribriform architecture (GG2-) as compared with those with Grade Group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of GG1 and GG2- prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed 835 radical prostatectomy specimens for Grade Group, pT stage, surgical margin status, and the presence of cribriform architecture. Biochemical recurrence-free survival and metastasis were used as clinical outcomes. GG1 prostate cancer was seen in 207 patients, and GG2 prostate cancer was seen in 420 patients, of whom 228 (54%) showed cribriform architecture (GG2+) and 192 (46%) did not. GG2- patients had higher prostate-specific antigen levels (9.4 ng/ml versus 7.0 ng/ml; P < 0.001), more often had extraprostatic extension (36% versus 11%; P < 0.001) and had more positive surgical margins (27% versus 17%; P = 0.01) than GG1 patients. GG2- patients had shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-4.9; P = 0.002) than GG1 patients. Lymph node and distant metastasis were observed neither in GG2- nor in GG1 patients, but occurred in 22 of 228 (10%) GG2+ patients.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, patients with GG2- prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy have more advanced disease and shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival than those with GG1 prostate cancer, but both groups have a very low risk of developing metastasis.

摘要

目的

在 2 级(GG2)前列腺癌患者中,浸润性筛状和导管内癌与侵袭性疾病相关。然而,与 1 级(GG1)前列腺癌相比,缺乏筛状结构的 GG2 前列腺癌(GG2-)患者的特征和临床结局尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨 GG1 和 GG2-前列腺癌在根治性前列腺切除标本中的临床和病理特征。

方法和结果

我们回顾了 835 例根治性前列腺切除术标本的 GG 分级、pT 分期、手术切缘状态和筛状结构的存在。生化无复发生存和转移用作临床结果。207 例患者为 GG1 前列腺癌,420 例患者为 GG2 前列腺癌,其中 228 例(54%)存在筛状结构(GG2+),192 例(46%)不存在。GG2-患者的前列腺特异性抗原水平更高(9.4ng/ml 比 7.0ng/ml;P<0.001),更常发生前列腺外延伸(36%比 11%;P<0.001),且更常存在阳性手术切缘(27%比 17%;P=0.01)。与 GG1 患者相比,GG2-患者的生化无复发生存时间更短(风险比 2.7,95%置信区间 1.4-4.9;P=0.002)。GG2-和 GG1 患者均未发生淋巴结和远处转移,但 GG2+患者中有 22 例(10%)发生了转移。

结论

总之,在根治性前列腺切除术中,GG2-前列腺癌患者的疾病更具侵袭性,且生化无复发生存时间短于 GG1 前列腺癌患者,但两组患者发生转移的风险均非常低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36dd/7216977/a99c00666aaf/HIS-76-755-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36dd/7216977/a99c00666aaf/HIS-76-755-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36dd/7216977/a99c00666aaf/HIS-76-755-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后有和无筛状结构的 Grade Group 1 和 Grade Group 2 前列腺癌的临床结局比较。
Histopathology. 2020 Apr;76(5):755-762. doi: 10.1111/his.14064.
2
Prevalence of adverse pathology features in grade group 2 prostatectomy specimens with syn- or metachronous metastatic disease.同时性或异时性转移性疾病的 2 级前列腺切除术标本中不良病理特征的发生率。
Prostate. 2022 Feb;82(3):345-351. doi: 10.1002/pros.24279. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer With Extraprostatic Extension Treated With Radical Prostatectomy.局限性前列腺癌伴包膜外侵犯患者行根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险。
J Urol. 2024 Mar;211(3):407-414. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003825. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
4
Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis.大筛状生长模式可识别出 ISUP 分级 2 级前列腺癌,其具有高复发和转移风险。
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jan;32(1):139-146. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0157-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients.在前列腺癌 Gleason 评分 8 分的患者中,根治性前列腺切除术中的筛状结构可预测肿瘤学结局。
Mod Pathol. 2021 Jan;34(1):184-193. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0625-x. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
6
Prostate Carcinoma Grade and Length But Not Cribriform Architecture at Positive Surgical Margins Are Predictive for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.前列腺癌分级和长度,但不是阳性手术切缘的筛状结构,是前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的预测因素。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Feb;44(2):191-197. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001384.
7
Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.在根治性前列腺切除术中,Gleason评分≤7(包括三级5级模式)的患者发生区域淋巴结转移的可能性。
BJU Int. 2017 Jun;119(6):872-878. doi: 10.1111/bju.13623. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
8
Grade group 2 (10% ≥ GP4) patients have very similar malignant potential with grade group 1 patients, given the risk of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.2 级(GP4≥10%)患者具有与 1 级患者非常相似的恶性潜能,因为存在前列腺导管内癌的风险。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr;26(4):764-769. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01841-4. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
9
Evaluating the Outcomes of Active Surveillance in Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer: Prospective Results from the Canary PASS Cohort.评估 2 级前列腺癌主动监测的结果:Canary PASS 队列的前瞻性结果。
J Urol. 2022 Apr;207(4):805-813. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002354. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
10
Concordance of cribriform architecture in matched prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.前列腺癌活检与根治性前列腺切除术标本中筛状结构的一致性。
Histopathology. 2019 Sep;75(3):338-345. doi: 10.1111/his.13893. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathological Assessment of Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.2级前列腺癌男性患者的病理评估
World J Mens Health. 2025 Jul;43(3):595-602. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230216. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Proposal for an optimised definition of adverse pathology (unfavourable histology) that predicts metastatic risk in prostatic adenocarcinoma independent of grade group and pathological stage.前列腺腺癌中,预测转移风险的不良病理学(不利组织学)的优化定义建议,与分级分组和病理分期无关。
Histopathology. 2024 Oct;85(4):598-613. doi: 10.1111/his.15231. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
Is cribriform pattern in prostate biopsy a risk factor for metastatic disease on Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT?

本文引用的文献

1
Improved Prostate Cancer Biopsy Grading by Incorporation of Invasive Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma in the 2014 Grade Groups.2014 年分级系统中纳入浸润性筛状和导管内癌可改善前列腺癌活检分级。
Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.051. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
2
Concordance of cribriform architecture in matched prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.前列腺癌活检与根治性前列腺切除术标本中筛状结构的一致性。
Histopathology. 2019 Sep;75(3):338-345. doi: 10.1111/his.13893. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis.
前列腺活检中的筛状模式是否是 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT 转移疾病的危险因素?
World J Urol. 2023 Aug;41(8):2165-2171. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04467-z. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
4
Prostate Cancer Morphologies: Cribriform Pattern and Intraductal Carcinoma Relations to Adverse Pathological and Clinical Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前列腺癌形态学:筛状模式及导管内癌与不良病理和临床结局的关系——系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;15(5):1372. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051372.
5
Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.无筛状结构模式的活检分级分组 2 前列腺癌患者中,格里森模式 4 百分比和 PI-RADS 评分可预测升级。
World J Urol. 2022 Nov;40(11):2723-2729. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04161-6. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
6
Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate as a Cause of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: A Molecular Portrait.前列腺导管内癌作为前列腺癌转移的原因:分子图谱
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 6;14(3):820. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030820.
7
Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients.筛状结构在预测 2 级前列腺癌患者的结局方面优于 Gleason 模式 4 百分比和三级 Gleason 模式 5。
Histopathology. 2022 Feb;80(3):558-565. doi: 10.1111/his.14590. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
8
Diagnosis of "cribriform" prostatic adenocarcinoma: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists with recommendations.“筛状”前列腺腺癌的诊断:一项针对泌尿外科病理学家的观察者间可重复性研究及建议
Am J Cancer Res. 2021 Aug 15;11(8):3990-4001. eCollection 2021.
9
Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients.Gleason 评分 5 分的前列腺癌患者术后临床结局较差。
Mod Pathol. 2021 Nov;34(11):2064-2070. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00860-4. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
10
Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy.筛状模式对接受根治性前列腺切除术的Gleason评分≥7/ISUP分级≥2的前列腺癌没有显著影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 18;99(38):e22156. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022156.
大筛状生长模式可识别出 ISUP 分级 2 级前列腺癌,其具有高复发和转移风险。
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jan;32(1):139-146. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0157-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Genetic and Epigenetic Determinants of Aggressiveness in Cribriform Carcinoma of the Prostate.前列腺筛状癌侵袭性行为的遗传和表观遗传决定因素。
Mol Cancer Res. 2019 Feb;17(2):446-456. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0440. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
5
Concordance of biopsy and prostatectomy diagnosis of intraductal and cribriform carcinoma in a prospectively collected data set.前瞻性数据集的活检和前列腺切除术诊断导管内和筛状癌的一致性。
Histopathology. 2019 Feb;74(3):474-482. doi: 10.1111/his.13747. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
6
Historical and contemporary perspectives on cribriform morphology in prostate cancer.前列腺癌筛状形态的历史和现代观点。
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Aug;15(8):475-482. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0013-1.
7
Cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer are associated with increased genomic instability and distinct genomic alterations.筛状和管内前列腺癌与基因组不稳定性增加和独特的基因组改变相关。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 2;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3976-z.
8
Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.在局限性前列腺癌中,根治性前列腺切除术标本中的三级Gleason分级模式与下一个更高Gleason评分组相比,预后更差。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(4):158.e1-158.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
9
Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.低危 Gleason 评分 6 与中危 Gleason 评分 3+4 前列腺癌的病理和肿瘤学结局比较:主动监测的考虑因素。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.116. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
10
Incidence of Extraprostatic Extension at Radical Prostatectomy with Pure Gleason Score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade Group 1) Cancer: Implications for Whether Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer Should be Renamed "Not Cancer" and for Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance.前列腺根治性切除术时单纯 Gleason 评分 3+3=6(分级分组 1)癌的前列腺外延伸发生率:对是否应将 Gleason 评分 6 前列腺癌重新命名为“非癌”以及主动监测选择标准的影响。
J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1482-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.067. Epub 2017 Nov 15.