• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃体切除术后气体填充和空气填充眼内的帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压测量法与戈德曼压平眼压测量法的比较

Pascal dynamic contour tonometry versus goldmann applanation tonometry in gas and air-filled eyes after vitrectomy surgery.

作者信息

Donaldson Mark J, Bhatnagar Pawan, Dhrami-Gavazi Elona, Santos Rodrigo A V, Barile Gaetano R, Del Priore Lucian V, Iranmanesh Reza, Schiff William M, Chang Stanley

机构信息

Edward Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Retina. 2009 Apr;29(4):481-6. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818c5dc9.

DOI:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818c5dc9
PMID:18936717
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in eyes after vitrectomy surgery with intraocular tamponade of air, silicone oil or perfluorocarbon gas.

METHODS

Prospective clinical comparative study. Eighty-two consecutive patients undergoing vitrectomy surgery with postoperative air, gas or oil tamponade were recruited. Intraocular pressure was measured with both devices.

RESULTS

Mean Goldmann intraocular pressure was 16.6 mmHg (range, 1.0-46.0; SD = 8.80) and the mean Pascal intraocular pressure was 21.70 (range, 4.7-58.5; SD = 9.8) The mean difference between the Pascal and Goldmann readings was 5.09 mmHg (range, -14.7 to +12.9; 95% CI = 4.2-6.0; SD, 4.0; P < 0.001). Mean differences for the different tamponades were 5.09 mmHg for silicone oil, 4.02 mmHg for air, and 5.38 mmHg for perfluorocarbon gas.

CONCLUSION

Pascal dynamic contour tonometry gives readings that are highly correlated with Goldmann applanation tonometry, but on average 5 mmHg higher in eyes after vitrectomy surgery with air, gas or silicone oil tamponades. The difference between Goldmann and Pascal readings does not appear to be altered by the presence of a scleral buckle, or the size of the intraocular gas bubble.

摘要

目的

比较在接受空气、硅油或全氟碳气体眼内填充的玻璃体切除术后的眼睛中,帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计的测量结果。

方法

前瞻性临床对照研究。招募了82例连续接受玻璃体切除术并在术后使用空气、气体或油填充的患者。使用两种设备测量眼压。

结果

戈德曼眼压计测量的平均眼压为16.6 mmHg(范围1.0 - 46.0;标准差 = 8.80),帕斯卡眼压计测量的平均眼压为21.70(范围4.7 - 58.5;标准差 = 9.8)。帕斯卡眼压计与戈德曼眼压计读数的平均差值为5.09 mmHg(范围 - 14.7至 + 12.9;95%置信区间 = 4.2 - 6.0;标准差,4.0;P < 0.001)。不同填充材料的平均差值分别为:硅油5.09 mmHg,空气4.02 mmHg,全氟碳气体5.38 mmHg。

结论

帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计的读数与戈德曼压平眼压计高度相关,但在接受空气、气体或硅油填充的玻璃体切除术后的眼睛中,平均高出5 mmHg。戈德曼眼压计与帕斯卡眼压计读数的差异似乎不受巩膜扣带的存在或眼内气泡大小的影响。

相似文献

1
Pascal dynamic contour tonometry versus goldmann applanation tonometry in gas and air-filled eyes after vitrectomy surgery.玻璃体切除术后气体填充和空气填充眼内的帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压测量法与戈德曼压平眼压测量法的比较
Retina. 2009 Apr;29(4):481-6. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818c5dc9.
2
Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact air puff versus Goldmann applanation tonometers in gas-filled vitrectomized eyes.非接触式气吹眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计测量充气玻璃体切除术后眼内压的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 May;86(5):467-72.
3
Goldmann Applanation Tonometry versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry after Vitrectomy with Silicone Oil Endotamponade.玻璃体切除联合硅油眼内填充术后Goldmann压平眼压计与动态轮廓眼压计的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2017 Jul;42(7):1007-1012. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2016.1264608. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
4
[Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].[青光眼患者使用Goldmann压平眼压计与经睑眼压计TGDc - 01“PRA”测量的眼压差]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005 Feb;222(2):123-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-857881.
5
Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计测量眼压的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2006 Feb;20(2):191-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701849.
6
Comparison of the utility of Pascal dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in routine clinical practice.在常规临床实践中比较帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计与 Goldmann 压平眼压计的实用性。
J Glaucoma. 2013 Jun-Jul;22(5):422-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824cb10c.
7
Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计在不对称开角型青光眼中的临床比较
J Glaucoma. 2007 Dec;16(8):694-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180408dc6.
8
Intraoperative assessment of intraocular pressure in vitrectomized air-filled and fluid-filled eyes.玻璃体切除术后气眼和液眼眼内压的术中评估。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;91(7):e524-8. doi: 10.1111/aos.12145. Epub 2013 May 28.
9
Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry--a comparative study.帕斯卡眼压计、ICare眼压计和戈德曼压平眼压计——一项对比研究。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;86(6):614-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01112.x.
10
Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.超重患者使用Goldmann压平眼压计与Perkins手持式压平眼压计测量的眼压差
Ophthalmology. 1998 Dec;105(12):2260-3. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91226-X.

引用本文的文献

1
[Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry].玻璃体切除术后眼压升高——Goldmann压平眼压计测量的眼压低于动态轮廓眼压计测量的眼压
Ophthalmologe. 2022 Jan;119(Suppl 1):71-76. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01443-z. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Changes in intraocular pressure after intraocular eye surgery-the influence of measuring technique.眼内手术后眼压的变化——测量技术的影响
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 18;12(6):967-973. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.06.14. eCollection 2019.