Suppr超能文献

超重患者使用Goldmann压平眼压计与Perkins手持式压平眼压计测量的眼压差

Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.

作者信息

dos Santos M G, Makk S, Berghold A, Eckhardt M, Haas A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1998 Dec;105(12):2260-3. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91226-X.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) caused by anatomic and physiologic factors in overweight patients when using Goldmann applanation tonometry.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy average-weight individuals who had no difficulties with IOP measurements at the slit lamp and 12 obese patients with suspected glaucoma who could position the head at the slit lamp only with great effort participated.

INTERVENTION

The authors compared IOP values between slit-lamp-mounted Goldmann applanation tonometry and Perkins hand-held tonometry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The difference in Goldmann and Perkins IOP measurements was examined.

RESULTS

In the group of obese patients, the mean IOP was 20.9+/-2.28 mmHg (mean +/- standard deviation; range, 18-26 mmHg) for the right eye and 21.4+/-3.16 mmHg (range, 16-28 mmHg) for the left eye when determined by Goldmann tonometry and 16.3+/-2.39 mmHg (range, 13-20 mmHg) for the right eye and 16.3+/-2.42 (range, 11-19 mmHg) for the left eye when determined by Perkins tonometry. The mean decrease was 4.5+/-1.3 mmHg (range, 3-7 mmHg) for the right eye and 4.9+/-1.9 mmHg (range, 2-9 mmHg) for the left eye. In the control group, the mean difference between the two types of tonometers for the right eye was 0.34+/-0.69 mmHg and for the left eye was 0.33+/-0.82 mmHg. Patients who had a falsely elevated IOP on Goldmann tonometry had an average body mass index of 34+/-3.82 (range, 28.5-41.9); most were female (5:1 ratio).

CONCLUSION

The authors believe simultaneous breath-holding and thorax compression, with subsequent increase in venous pressure, may be a causative factor for transitory elevations of IOP. Perkins tonometry in obese patients may help avoid a false diagnosis of glaucoma caused by transitory elevations in IOP.

摘要

目的

分析超重患者使用戈德曼压平眼压计测量眼压时,解剖学和生理学因素导致的眼压升高情况。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

参与者

70名在裂隙灯下测量眼压无困难的正常体重个体,以及12名疑似青光眼的肥胖患者,这些肥胖患者只能很费力地在裂隙灯下摆正头部位置。

干预

作者比较了裂隙灯安装的戈德曼压平眼压计和珀金手持式眼压计测量的眼压值。

主要观察指标

检查戈德曼眼压计和珀金眼压计测量眼压的差异。

结果

在肥胖患者组中,使用戈德曼眼压计测量时,右眼平均眼压为20.9±2.28 mmHg(平均值±标准差;范围18 - 26 mmHg),左眼为21.4±3.16 mmHg(范围16 - 28 mmHg);使用珀金眼压计测量时,右眼平均眼压为16.3±2.39 mmHg(范围13 - 20 mmHg),左眼为16.3±2.42 mmHg(范围11 - 19 mmHg)。右眼平均降低4.5±1.3 mmHg(范围3 - 7 mmHg),左眼平均降低4.9±1.9 mmHg(范围2 - 9 mmHg)。在对照组中,两种眼压计测量右眼的平均差异为0.34±0.69 mmHg,测量左眼的平均差异为0.33±0.82 mmHg。戈德曼眼压计测量眼压出现假性升高的患者平均体重指数为34±3.82(范围28.5 - 41.9);大多数为女性(比例为5:1)。

结论

作者认为,屏气和胸部按压同时进行,随后静脉压升高,可能是眼压短暂升高的一个致病因素。肥胖患者使用珀金眼压计可能有助于避免因眼压短暂升高导致的青光眼误诊。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验