Gute Gary, Eshbaugh Elaine M, Wiersma Jacquelyn
University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0332, USA.
J Sex Res. 2008 Oct-Dec;45(4):329-37. doi: 10.1080/00224490802398332.
The purpose of this study was to determine if undergraduates (N = 839) apply the same standard to themselves when labeling a behavior "having sex" as they apply to their significant others if those persons engage in the same behaviors outside the relationship. Using a between-participants design, one form asked participants if each of 11 behaviors constituted having sex if they engaged in the activity; the other form asked participants if each of the same behaviors constituted having sex if their significant other engaged in the activity outside their relationship. Participants answering for themselves were less likely to indicate a behavior was having sex for all behaviors except penile-anal and penile-vaginal intercourse. Men were also more likely than women to indicate most behaviors were having sex. The authors discuss what they define as a definitional discontinuity in undergraduate emerging adults' definitions of having sex. Fundamental attribution error (FAE) and emerging adulthood literature are used to explain the findings. Health and relationship implications are identified.
本研究的目的是确定大学生(N = 839)在将一种行为标记为“发生性行为”时,对于自己和他们的重要他人在关系之外进行相同行为时,是否应用相同的标准。采用被试间设计,一种形式询问参与者,如果他们自己进行这11种行为中的每一种,是否构成发生性行为;另一种形式询问参与者,如果他们的重要他人在关系之外进行相同行为,这些行为中的每一种是否构成发生性行为。为自己作答的参与者除了阴茎-肛门和阴茎-阴道性交外,不太可能认为所有行为都构成发生性行为。男性也比女性更有可能认为大多数行为构成发生性行为。作者讨论了他们所定义的本科新兴成年人对发生性行为定义中的定义不连续性。基本归因错误(FAE)和新兴成年期文献被用来解释这些发现。同时还确定了对健康和关系的影响。