Suppr超能文献

胺碘酮治疗恶性室性心律失常:经验性给药与动态心电图或心室刺激引导下给药的比较。平行试验结果

[Treatment of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmia with amiodarone: comparison of empirical administration and administration guided by Holter or ventricular stimulation. Results of the parallel test].

作者信息

Raviele A, Di Pede F, Gasparini G, Zanocco A, Delise P, Bonso A, D'Este D, Piccolo E

机构信息

Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Umberto I, Mestre Venezia.

出版信息

G Ital Cardiol. 1991 Mar;21(3):259-69.

PMID:1894120
Abstract

To assess the most appropriate method of administering amiodarone and predicting its efficacy (empiric vs guided by Holter or by ventricular stimulation), 19 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation underwent a "parallel study". Fifteen patients were men and 4 women, with a mean age of 65 years. A coronary artery disease with previous myocardial infarction was present in 15 patients, dilated cardiomyopathy in 3 and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia in 1 (mean left ventricular ejection fraction = 35%). All 19 patients had, as inclusion criteria, 1) frequent (greater than or equal to 30/hour) and/or repetitive (greater than or equal to 10/24 hours) ventricular premature beats during 24-hour Holter monitoring and 2) inducible sustained (greater than 30/sec) ventricular arrhythmias during programmed ventricular stimulation (1-3 extrastimuli from 2 right ventricular sites). Amiodarone was given at an initial dosage of 15 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks and then at a dosage of 5 mg/kg/day. After 15 days 24-hour Holter monitoring and programmed ventricular stimulation were repeated. The data of these tests, however, were not used to guide the therapy that remained empiric, but served only to assess retrospectively the predictive value of Holter monitoring and ventricular stimulation. The following main results were obtained: The mean duration of follow-up was 25 +/- 13 months. During this period 6 patients (32%) died, 3 from sudden and 3 from non-sudden cardiac death. Two other patients had recurrence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias. After 15 days of therapy amiodarone was effective at Holter monitoring in 15 patients (79%) and not effective in 4 (21%). Two of the 15 patients considered responders died suddenly during the follow-up and 2 had arrhythmic recurrence, vs 1 of the 4 non-responder patients who died suddenly (negative predictive value of Holter monitoring: 73%; positive predictive value: 25%; predictive accuracy: 63%). After 15 days of therapy amiodarone was effective at ventricular stimulation in 10 patients (53%) and not effective in 9 (47%). None of the 10 patients considered responders had arrhythmic events during the follow-up, vs 5 of the 9 non-responders, 3 of whom died suddenly and 2 of whom had arrhythmic recurrences (negative predictive value of ventricular stimulation: 100%; positive predictive value: 56%; predictive accuracy: 79%). Only 1 patient discontinued amiodarone after 25 months of follow-up because of development of an important blue-grey skin discoloration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

为评估胺碘酮的最佳给药方法并预测其疗效(经验性用药 vs 动态心电图或心室刺激引导用药),19例持续性室性心动过速或心室颤动患者进行了一项“平行研究”。15例为男性,4例为女性,平均年龄65岁。15例患者有冠状动脉疾病伴既往心肌梗死,3例有扩张型心肌病,1例有心律失常性右心室发育不良(平均左心室射血分数 = 35%)。所有19例患者纳入标准为:1)24小时动态心电图监测期间频发(≥30次/小时)和/或反复(≥10次/24小时)室性早搏;2)程序性心室刺激期间可诱发持续性(>30次/秒)室性心律失常(来自2个右心室部位的1 - 3次额外刺激)。胺碘酮初始剂量为15 mg/kg/天,持续2周,然后为5 mg/kg/天。15天后重复24小时动态心电图监测和程序性心室刺激。然而,这些检查数据未用于指导仍为经验性的治疗,仅用于回顾性评估动态心电图监测和心室刺激的预测价值。获得以下主要结果:平均随访时间为25±13个月。在此期间,6例患者(32%)死亡,3例猝死,3例非猝死性心源性死亡。另外2例患者出现持续性室性心律失常复发。治疗15天后,胺碘酮在动态心电图监测中对15例患者(79%)有效,4例(21%)无效。15例反应者中有2例在随访期间猝死,2例心律失常复发,而4例无反应者中有1例猝死(动态心电图监测的阴性预测值:73%;阳性预测值:25%;预测准确性:63%)。治疗15天后,胺碘酮在心室刺激中对10例患者(53%)有效,9例(47%)无效。10例反应者在随访期间均无心律失常事件,而9例无反应者中有5例出现心律失常事件,其中3例猝死,2例心律失常复发(心室刺激的阴性预测值:100%;阳性预测值:56%;预测准确性:79%)。仅1例患者在随访25个月后因出现明显的蓝灰色皮肤色素沉着而停用胺碘酮。(摘要截短至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验