Herman M A B, Davidson J K, Smart C D
Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 14456, USA.
Phytopathology. 2008 Nov;98(11):1226-32. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-11-1226.
Plant activators provide an appealing management option for bacterial diseases of greenhouse-grown tomatoes. Two types of plant activators, one that induces systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and a second that activates induced systemic resistance (ISR), were evaluated for control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and effect on plant defense gene activation. Benzothiadiazole (BTH, SAR-inducing compound) effectively reduced bacterial speck incidence and severity, both alone and in combination with the ISR-inducing product. Application of BTH also led to elevated activation of salicylic acid and ethylene-mediated responses, based on real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of marker gene expression levels. In contrast, the ISR-inducing product (made up of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria) inconsistently modified defense gene expression and did not provide disease control to the same level as did BTH. No antagonism was observed by combining the two activators as control of bacterial speck was similar to or better than BTH alone.
植物激活剂为温室种植番茄的细菌性病害提供了一种有吸引力的管理选择。评估了两种类型的植物激活剂,一种诱导系统获得性抗性(SAR),另一种激活诱导系统抗性(ISR),以控制丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种,并研究其对植物防御基因激活的影响。苯并噻二唑(BTH,一种诱导SAR的化合物)单独使用或与诱导ISR的产品联合使用时,均能有效降低细菌性斑点病的发病率和严重程度。基于对标记基因表达水平的实时聚合酶链反应分析,施用BTH还导致水杨酸和乙烯介导的反应激活水平升高。相比之下,诱导ISR的产品(由促进植物生长的根际细菌组成)对防御基因表达的调节不一致,且在病害防治方面未达到与BTH相同的水平。将两种激活剂联合使用时未观察到拮抗作用,因为对细菌性斑点病的防治效果与单独使用BTH相似或更好。