• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致病疫霉的一种培养滤液可引发马铃薯细胞悬浮液中的防御反应。

A culture filtrate of Phytophthora infestans primes defense reaction in potato cell suspensions.

作者信息

Val F, Desender S, Bernard K, Potin P, Hamelin G, Andrivon D

机构信息

INRA, Agrocampus Rennes, UMR1099 BiO3P (Biology of Organisms and Populations applied to Plant Protection), F-35000 Rennes, France.

出版信息

Phytopathology. 2008 Jun;98(6):653-8. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0653.

DOI:10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0653
PMID:18944288
Abstract

Priming of defense reactions by an elicitor results in an enhanced ability of the plant to respond to subsequent pathogen challenges. We previously showed that application of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) to potato cell suspensions causes apoplastic acidification, but does not stimulate lipoxygenase (LOX) activity. Here, we tested the ability of various elicitors to prime and elicit defense reactions in potato cell suspensions. Adding 20 microg ml(1) LPS, laminarin, harpin N, or a concentrated culture filtrate (CCF) of Phytophthora infestans to cell cultures 18 h before a second elicitation with LPS did not alter the intensity of apoplastic acidification compared with a single LPS application. Conversely, high concentrations (200 or 400 microg ml(1)) of LPS, laminarin, and harpin N activated LOX in cells pretreated with 1 microg ml(1) CCF, but not in cells pretreated with LPS, laminarin, or harpin N. LOX response was maximal in pretreated cells of potato cv. Bintje when the second elicitation occurred 18 to 24 h after CCF application. These results showed that LOX activation is primed in potato cells by CCF, but not by LPS, harpin N, or laminarin. Finally, bioassays showed a slightly greater reduction of rot weight in half tubers treated with CCF followed by LPS before inoculation with Pectobacterium atrosepticum than in half tubers treated with either preparation alone, indicating a priming effect of CCF on both LOX induction and disease suppression.

摘要

激发子引发的防御反应会增强植物对后续病原体挑战的响应能力。我们之前表明,将脂多糖(LPS)应用于马铃薯细胞悬浮液会导致质外体酸化,但不会刺激脂氧合酶(LOX)活性。在此,我们测试了各种激发子引发和诱导马铃薯细胞悬浮液中防御反应的能力。在第二次用LPS激发前18小时向细胞培养物中添加20微克/毫升的LPS、海带多糖、harpin N或致病疫霉的浓缩培养滤液(CCF),与单次应用LPS相比,质外体酸化的强度没有改变。相反,高浓度(200或400微克/毫升)的LPS、海带多糖和harpin N在经1微克/毫升CCF预处理的细胞中激活了LOX,但在经LPS、海带多糖或harpin N预处理的细胞中未激活。当第二次激发在CCF应用后18至24小时进行时,马铃薯品种宾杰的预处理细胞中LOX反应最大。这些结果表明,CCF可引发马铃薯细胞中LOX的激活,而LPS、harpin N或海带多糖则不能。最后,生物测定表明,在接种黑胫果胶杆菌之前,先用CCF处理然后用LPS处理的半块块茎的腐烂重量减少幅度略大于单独用任何一种制剂处理的半块块茎,这表明CCF对LOX诱导和病害抑制均有引发作用。

相似文献

1
A culture filtrate of Phytophthora infestans primes defense reaction in potato cell suspensions.致病疫霉的一种培养滤液可引发马铃薯细胞悬浮液中的防御反应。
Phytopathology. 2008 Jun;98(6):653-8. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0653.
2
Lipopolysaccharides of Pectobacterium atrosepticum and Pseudomonas corrugata induce different defence response patterns in tobacco, tomato, and potato.黑胫果胶杆菌和皱叶假单胞菌的脂多糖在烟草、番茄和马铃薯中诱导不同的防御反应模式。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006 Sep;8(5):636-45. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924102. Epub 2006 Jun 1.
3
Differential induction of oxylipin pathway in potato and tobacco cells by bacterial and oomycete elicitors.细菌和卵菌激发子诱导马铃薯和烟草细胞中氧化脂类途径的差异。
Plant Cell Rep. 2013 May;32(5):579-89. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1377-y. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
4
Quantitative resistance of potato to Pectobacterium atrosepticum and Phytophthora infestans: integrating PAMP-triggered response and pathogen growth.马铃薯对果胶杆菌和疫霉的定量抗性:整合模式识别触发反应和病原体生长。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023331. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
5
Phytophthora infestans-triggered response of growth- and defense-related genes in potato cultivars with different levels of resistance under the influence of nitrogen availability.在氮素供应影响下,不同抗性水平马铃薯品种中疫霉菌引发的生长和防御相关基因的响应。
Physiol Plant. 2008 Jun;133(2):386-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01048.x. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
6
Salicylic acid is important for basal defense of Solanum tuberosum against Phytophthora infestans.水杨酸对于马铃薯抵御致病疫霉的基础防御至关重要。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007 Nov;20(11):1346-52. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-20-11-1346.
7
Identification of three elicitins and a galactan-based complex polysaccharide from a concentrated culture filtrate of Phytophthora infestans efficient against Pectobacterium atrosepticum.从致病疫霉浓缩培养滤液中鉴定出三种激发素和一种基于半乳聚糖的复合多糖,其对黑胫果胶杆菌具有高效抗性。
Molecules. 2014 Sep 26;19(10):15374-90. doi: 10.3390/molecules191015374.
8
Early responses of tobacco suspension cells to rhizobacterial elicitors of induced systemic resistance.烟草悬浮细胞对诱导系统抗性的根际细菌激发子的早期反应。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008 Dec;21(12):1609-21. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-12-1609.
9
Nicotiflorin, rutin and chlorogenic acid: phenylpropanoids involved differently in quantitative resistance of potato tubers to biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens.烟碱苷、芦丁和绿原酸:参与马铃薯块茎对生物亲和性和坏死性病原菌定量抗性的苯丙烷类化合物。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Aug;57:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 15.
10
Methanol extract of mycelia from Phytophthora infestans-induced resistance in potato.致病疫霉诱导马铃薯产生抗性的菌丝体甲醇提取物。
C R Biol. 2015 Mar;338(3):185-96. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Infection of a tomato cell culture by ; a versatile tool to study -host interactions.番茄细胞培养物被……感染;一种研究宿主相互作用的通用工具。 (原文中“;”处内容缺失,翻译可能不完整)
Plant Methods. 2017 Oct 25;13:88. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0240-0. eCollection 2017.
2
Identification of three elicitins and a galactan-based complex polysaccharide from a concentrated culture filtrate of Phytophthora infestans efficient against Pectobacterium atrosepticum.从致病疫霉浓缩培养滤液中鉴定出三种激发素和一种基于半乳聚糖的复合多糖,其对黑胫果胶杆菌具有高效抗性。
Molecules. 2014 Sep 26;19(10):15374-90. doi: 10.3390/molecules191015374.
3
Differential induction of oxylipin pathway in potato and tobacco cells by bacterial and oomycete elicitors.
细菌和卵菌激发子诱导马铃薯和烟草细胞中氧化脂类途径的差异。
Plant Cell Rep. 2013 May;32(5):579-89. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1377-y. Epub 2013 Mar 12.